All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
The gvhd Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the gvhd Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The gvhd and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View GvHD content recommended for you
Results from a single-center retrospective study comparing ruxolitinib (Rux) + extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) (n = 31) vs Rux alone (n = 37) in patients with steroid-refractory (SR) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) were recently published in the Journal of Clinical Medicine Research by Halahleh et al. The primary objective was to compare the overall response rate (ORR) at last encounter between treatment arms. Key secondary endpoints included incidence of progression from aGvHD to cGvHD, 1-year non-relapse mortality (NRM), GvHD relapse-free survival (GRFS), and survival outcomes.
Key data: The ORR at last encounter was 58% for Rux + ECP vs 49% for Rux alone (p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in progression to cGvHD between treatment groups (74% [95% confidence interval [CI], 55–87%] vs 59% [95% CI, 41–76%] for Rux + ECP and Rux alone, respectively [p = 0.387]). No significant difference in 1-year NRM (19% vs 0%; p = 0.31), 3-year survival (70% vs 80%; p = 0.36), or 3-year GRFS (94.7% vs 100%; p = 0.23) was observed between Rux + ECP vs Rux alone.
Key learning: Combining Rux with ECP may improve long-term control of SR-aGvHD and cGvHD compared with Rux alone, supporting the potential benefit of dual immunomodulatory approaches in this setting.
References
Your opinion matters
Which consideration most strongly guides your decision to escalate therapy in SR-aGvHD?