All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know GvHD.

  TRANSLATE

The GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Efficacy and safety of MSCs for GvHD prophylaxis and SR‑aGvHD treatment

By Nathan Fisher

Share:

Apr 8, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in graft-versus-host disease.


A PROSPERO-registered systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD420251059633) of 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), evaluating mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prevention in patients with hematological disorders undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), and for the treatment of patients with Grade 2–4 steroid-refractory acute GvHD (SR‑aGvHD), was published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy by Wu et al. Eleven trials assessed prophylaxis and four assessed SR‑aGvHD treatment. The primary outcomes were aGvHD and chronic GvHD (cGvHD) incidence in the prophylaxis analysis (n = 499 and n = 551, respectively) and overall response rate (ORR) in the treatment analysis (n = 548).

Key data: MSC treatment was associated with a reduced incidence of aGvHD (pooled odds ratio [OR], 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32–0.71; p = 0.00003) and cGvHD (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.34–0.74; p = 0.0005) vs non‑MSC therapy. In SR‑aGvHD, MSC treatment was associated with a higher ORR (pooled OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.04–2.17; p = 0.03) and complete remission (CR) rate (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.31–3.37; p = 0.002) vs non‑MSC therapy. Use of MSCs was not associated with improvements in overall survival (OS), relapse incidence, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection rate, relapse-related mortality, platelet or neutrophil engraftment, or disease-/progression-free survival (DFS/PFS). MSCs were well tolerated, with no immediate or long-term toxicity reported across trials.

Key learning: MSC therapy was associated with a reduced incidence of both aGvHD and cGvHD, and improved response rates, compared with non‑MSC therapy, supporting its continued evaluation as a clinical strategy for GvHD prevention and SR‑aGvHD management.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

In steroid-refractory acute GvHD, which factor most strongly limits your use of mesenchymal stromal cells in routine clinical practice?