All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.

  TRANSLATE

The gvhd Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the gvhd Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The gvhd and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

What are the major challenges in the treatment of SR-GvHD, and how can clinicians overcome these?

By Haimanti Mandal

Share:

Featured:

Corey CutlerCorey Cutler

Oct 13, 2025

Learning objective: After watching this video, learners will be able to identify the key challenges in treating SR-GvHD and the approaches clinicians can use to overcome them.


Do you know... In what timeframe can newer second- or third-line agents for SR-cGvHD demonstrate signs of efficacy?

Despite advances in preventing chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), transplant recipients continue to be affected, with steroid-refractoriness associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality.1

The GvHD Hub spoke with Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, US. We asked, What are the major challenges in the treatment of steroid-refractory GvHD (SR-GvHD), and how can clinicians overcome these?

What are the major challenges in the treatment of SR-GvHD, and how can clinicians overcome these?

Key Learnings

  • There are four U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved agents (ibrutinib, belumosudil, ruxolitinib, and axatilimab) for the treatment of SR chronic GvHD, all indicated for use in the second or third line of therapy.2
  • Optimal sequencing of these agents remains a significant challenge for clinicians, particularly as advances in the therapeutic landscape now allow earlier assessment of treatment response, with novel agents showing efficacy within approximately 8 weeks, compared with 3–6 months for older treatments, enabling more timely transitions to alternative therapies when needed.
  • Another key challenge is selecting the most appropriate initial therapy; expanded access to biomarkers or other biologic information that can accurately predict response to specific agents could address this gap.
    • Furthermore, markers that can predict response after therapy has been initiated, such as increases in regulatory T cells observed with interleukin-2 or belumosudil, may prove helpful.
  • However, predictive biomarkers to guide therapy prior to treatment initiation are still limited and, in such cases, most clinicians rely on clinical features to guide treatment choice.
  • Safety and tolerability of the drugs are also critical in treatment selection, as each drug has a unique side-effect profile that may restrict its use in some patients.
  • Balancing efficacy, safety, and patient quality of life remains central to treatment selection.

This educational resource is independently supported by Sanofi. All content was developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee. Funders were allowed no influence on the content of this resource.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content