All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know GvHD.

  TRANSLATE

The GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

REACH5 final analysis: Ruxolitinib in pediatric treatment-naïve/steroid-refractory cGvHD

By Nathan Fisher

Share:

Mar 26, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in pediatric graft-versus-host disease.


Results from the final analysis of the phase II REACH5 study (NCT03774082), evaluating ruxolitinibcorticosteroids (CS) in pediatric patients (aged 2–18 years; N = 45) with treatment-naïve or steroid-refractory moderate-to-severe chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD), were published in Haematologica by Locatelli et al. The REACH5 study design and interim results have been previously reported on the GvHD Hub.

Key data: At a median follow-up of 36 months, the best overall response (BOR) rate was 84.4% (90% confidence interval [CI], 72.8–92.5; complete response [CR], 31.1%; partial response [PR], 53.3%). The median duration of response (DoR), failure-free survival (FFS), and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The 12‑month and 36‑month OS rates were 84.2% (95% CI, 69.7–92.2) and 74.9% (95% CI, 59.3–85.3), respectively. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was reported in 20.0% of patients. The overall CS‑free response rate was 42.2% (90% CI, 29.7–55.5). Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 68.9% of patients, while no new safety concerns emerged with longer ruxolitinib exposure.

Key learning: These results demonstrate the efficacy and manageable safety profile of ruxolitinib in pediatric patients with treatment-naïve or steroid-refractory moderate-to-severe cGvHD. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

In steroid-refractory acute GvHD, which factor most strongly limits your use of mesenchymal stromal cells in routine clinical practice?