All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know GvHD.
The GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GVHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through independent educational grants from Incyte, Sanofi and Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View GvHD content recommended for you
Results from a secondary analysis of a Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) dataset (P-5891), comparing post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)- vs antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-based graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis in adults undergoing first 7/8 human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) during 2017–2021, were published in Transplantation and Cellular Therapy by Rodriguez-Rodriguez et al. The analysis included 834 adults who received PTCy + calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; n = 613) or ATG + CNI + methotrexate (MTX; n = 221). Endpoints of interest included GvHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS), overall survival (OS), relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), and incidence of acute and chronic GvHD.
Key data: At 24 months, PTCy vs ATG was associated with improved GRFS (44.9% vs 26.7%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.58; p < 0.001) and OS (63.9% vs 46.6%; aHR, 0.60; p < 0.001). NRM was lower with PTCy vs ATG (17.2% vs 35.1%; aHR, 0.44; p < 0.001), while cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) at 24 months was comparable between groups (25.9% vs 24.6%; aHR, 1.07; p = 0.68). The cumulative incidences of Grade 2–4 and Grade 3–4 acute GvHD (aGvHD) at 3 months were lower with PTCy vs ATG (30.7% vs 50.3%; aHR, 0.51 and 7.7% vs 23.8%; aHR, 0.29, respectively; both p < 0.001), while moderate-to-severe chronic GvHD (cGvHD) did not significantly differ at 24 months (15.8% vs 19.3%; aHR, 0.72; p = 0.081).
Key learning: These registry-based data support the use of PTCy-based GvHD prophylaxis in adults undergoing 7/8 MMUD allo-HSCT. Prospective studies comparing this approach to ATG-based prophylaxis in MMUD recipients are needed to confirm these findings.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content