All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know GvHD.
The GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View GvHD content recommended for you
Results from a multicenter, retrospective study conducted on behalf of the Grupo Español de Trasplante Hematopoyético y Terapia Celular (GETH-TC), evaluating post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis in adults with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing first peripheral blood allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) (N = 291), were published in Transplantation and Cellular Therapy by Salas et al. Outcomes were analyzed in the entire cohort and stratified by age group (>65 years, n = 82; ≤65 years, n = 209).
Key data: Median follow-up was 23.0 months. The cumulative incidence of acute GvHD (aGvHD) by Day +100 was 27.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.8–33.1) for Grade 2–4 and 12.0% (95% CI, 8.6–16.1) for Grade 3–4; at 2 years, moderate-to-severe chronic GvHD (cGvHD) was 20.0% (95% CI, 15.2–25.2). The incidence of GvHD was consistent across age groups. At 3 years, overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and GvHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) were 54.6% (95% CI, 48.4–60.4), 21.5% (95% CI, 16.8–26.6), 28.4% (95% CI, 23.2–33.8), and 33.7% (95% CI, 28.0–39.4), respectively. Patients aged >65 years had higher 3-year NRM vs patients aged ≤65 years (35.2% vs 25.7%; p = 0.039), while OS, CIR, GRFS, and infectious complications were comparable. Grade 3–4 aGvHD was independently associated with higher NRM (hazard ratio [HR], 4.20; 95% CI, 2.53–6.91; p < 0.001).
Key learning: PTCy-based GvHD prophylaxis is feasible in patients with MDS undergoing allo-HSCT, including selected older adults; however, further efforts are needed to reduce NRM.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content