All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
The gvhd Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the gvhd Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The gvhd and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View GvHD content recommended for you
Findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis, investigating mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for the management of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGvHD), were recently published in Scientific Reports by Debes et al. Data from 16 clinical trials (N = 1,301) were analyzed. Primary endpoints included safety of MSC intravenous infusion, overall response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS). However, due to the limited number of placebo-controlled trials, a meta-analysis of adverse events (AEs) related to MSCs was not possible. Secondary endpoints included complete response (CR) rate, relapse rate (RR), and organ-specific response.
Key data: AEs were limited, including nausea and vomiting (n = 1) and headache (n = 1). Serious AEs and Grade ≥3 AEs were reported, although these were comparable with control cohorts. The ORR was 61% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54–0.67) and the CR rate was 29% (95% CI, 0.23–0.36). At a median of 12 months, the OS rate was 34% (95% CI, 0.29–0.4); following assessment of the controlled trials (MSC infusion, n = 348; control, n = 234), OS rate post-MSC infusion was comparable with control (overall ratio [OR], 1.15; 95% CI, 0.81–1.62). Frequent MSC infusions (≥4 within 28 days) achieved superior ORR (64% vs 47%; p = 0.04) and OS (40% vs 22%; p < 0.0001) compared with infrequent infusions, and a dose of 1 × 106 cells/kg was comparable with ≥2 × 106 cells/kg.
Key learning: MSCs represent an effective therapeutic option for SR-aGvHD, with optimal outcomes achieved using 1 × 10⁶ cells/kg administered at least four times within the first 28 days of treatment.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
Which consideration most strongly guides your decision to escalate therapy in SR-aGvHD?