TRANSLATE

The gvhd Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the gvhd Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The gvhd and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Key insights into MSCs for aGvHD – the current clinical trial landscape

By Ella Dixon

Share:

Apr 9, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to understand the current status of MSC treatment in aGvHD, and recall key trials and approvals in this area.


Question 1 1

Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-Frankfurt am Main (MSC-FFM), an allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) treatment, differs from other MSC treatments for GvHD in which way?

A

It is created with cells from one related donor

B

It is created with cells from one unrelated donor

C

It is created with cells from multiple donors pooled together

D

It is administered as an intravenous infusion

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have emerged as a potential therapy option in patients with steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GvHD).1 MSCs do not express human leukocyte antigen class II and can therefore be administered without the need for matching, giving them a distinct advantage over other cellular therapies.1

The GvHD Hub spoke to Robert Zeiser, Medical Center – University of Freiberg, Freiberg, DE, about his key insights into MSCs for aGvHD, and the current clinical trial landscape. 

Key insights into MSCs for aGvHD – the current clinical trial landscape

The MSC clinical trial landscape 

  • The first patient treated with MSCs, in 2004, experienced improvements in gastrointestinal and hepatic manifestations of severe GvHD after infusion of haploidentical MSCs. Since then, there have been multiple studies investigating MSCs as a potential treatment in aGvHD, although not all trials have met their primary endpoint.

  • In general, MSCs are well tolerated by patients, with promising efficacy demonstrated in clinical trials; however, there is some variation in response rates.

  • The mechanism of action of MSCs is still unclear; current evidence suggests that intravascular MSC destruction is followed by monocyte-mediated immune modulation, with monocytes playing a key role in the efficacy of the treatment.

Recent developments

  • Remestemcel-L-rknd, an allogeneic bone marrow-derived MSC therapy, was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on December 18, 2024, for the treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) in pediatric patients (aged ≥2 months).

  • Another allogeneic MSC product, Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-Frankfurt am Main (MSC-FFM), is currently being investigated in the phase III IDUNN trial (NCT04629833) across multiple centers in Europe. The trial will compare MSC-FFM to the best available therapy in patients with SR-aGvHD. This therapy differs from other MSC products, as it is made from pooling cells from multiple donors rather than a single donor, and is already available for use in Germany under Hospital Exemption. 

This educational resource is independently supported by Medac. All content was developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee; funders were allowed no influence on the content of this resource. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content