The gvhd Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the gvhd Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The gvhd and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View gvhd content recommended for you
Featured:
The GvHD Hub is happy to present a visual abstract summarizing key findings from a prospective, double-blind trial evaluating the efficacy of high-dose vitamin A for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in pediatric patients undergoing an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant, as presented during the 2023 Transplantation & Cellular Therapy Meetings of ASTCT and CIBMTR.
Baseline patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Despite a higher proportion of patients in the vitamin A cohort having characteristics that predispose them to GvHD (HLA mismatching, donor relation, and the use of unmanipulated peripheral blood stem cells), patients in the vitamin A cohort had a lower incidence of GvHD.1
Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics*
GvHD, graft-versus-host disease; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MTX, methotrexate; PTCy, post-transplant cyclophosphamide; TCR, T-cell receptor. |
|||
Characteristic, n (unless otherwise stated) |
Vitamin A |
Placebo |
p value |
---|---|---|---|
Median age (range), years |
6.9 (2–20) |
8.5 (1.1–28) |
0.2 |
Underlying diagnosis |
|
|
0.6 |
Malignancy |
8 |
9 |
|
Primary immune deficiency |
8 |
6 |
|
Bone marrow failure |
14 |
17 |
|
Hemoglobinopathy |
8 |
8 |
|
Metabolic disorder |
2 |
0 |
|
Conditioning regimen |
|
|
0.8 |
Myeloablative |
25 |
27 |
|
Reduced intensity |
15 |
13 |
|
Serotherapy |
24 |
28 |
0.4 |
Radiation in conditioning |
4 |
2 |
0.6 |
HLA match |
|
|
0.1 |
≥2 antigen mismatch |
5 |
2 |
|
9/10 |
11 |
6 |
|
10/10 |
24 |
32 |
|
Donor relation |
|
|
0.1 |
Related (excluding ≥2 antigen mismatch) |
8 |
15 |
|
Related (≥2 antigen mismatch) |
4 |
1 |
|
Unrelated |
28 |
24 |
|
GvHD prophylaxis |
|
|
0.4 |
Calcineurin inhibitor + MMF |
9 |
5 |
|
Calcineurin inhibitor + MTX |
1 |
5 |
|
Calcineurin inhibitor + prednisone |
2 |
2 |
|
T-cell depletion |
12 |
10 |
|
αβ CD19 TCR depletion |
0 |
2 |
|
Abatacept to standard prophylaxis |
15 |
14 |
|
PTCy |
1 |
1 |
|
The use of high-dose vitamin A is already recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for treatment of children with acute measles.1 Vitamin A is involved in gut homeostasis by maintaining barrier function and expression of junction proteins in the intestinal epithelium. The level of CCR9+ CD8+ effector memory T-cells were significantly higher in the placebo arm at Day 30 posttransplant compared with the vitamin A arm; therefore, this shows that gut T-cell trafficking was reduced in patients treated with vitamin A (p = 0.01).1
We asked, Do you think this result will translate into adult patients?
“We plan to open another study of oral vitamin A in adult BMT patients to see if our findings translate to patients of all ages.”
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content