TRANSLATE

The gvhd Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the gvhd Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The gvhd and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Two different treatment approaches in combination with ECP for the management of steroid refractory aGvHD: etanercept and ruxolitinib

By Paola Frisone

Share:

Jun 24, 2020


Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) can develop following stem cell transplantation (SCT) with an occurrence rate of up to 50% of all allogeneic SCT (allo-SCT). Steroids are considered as the first-line treatment; however, response rates usually do not exceed 30–40% and there is no accepted standard of care for steroid refractory (SR) aGvHD. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is another approach that combines UVA light and 8-methoxypsoralen for the management of acute and chronic GvHD.

Two different studies have recently reported results using ECP in combination with other agents for the treatment of SR aGvHD. While Singh and colleagues presented their results during the 2020 ASCO Virtual Meeting evaluating etanercept with or without ECP in patients with SR aGvHD1, Modemann and colleagues investigated ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor in combination with ECP for the treatment of SR acute and chronic GvHD of the lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and have published their results in Bone Marrow Transplantation.2

ECP with etanercept for the treatment of SR aGvHD1

Singh and colleagues assessed the efficacy of etanercept plus ECP by analyzing the change in grade of aGvHD and death rate due to infection. Most patients had myelodysplastic syndrome as underlying disease. All patients (N = 30) received second-line etanercept treatment at a subcutaneous dose of 25 mg twice weekly for at least 4 weeks. Patient characteristics and the study design are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Patient characteristics and study design1

ECP, extracorporeal photopheresis

Characteristic

N = 30

Number of patients who received ECP, n (%)

25 (83.3)

Median age, years (range)

57.6 (19–71)

 

The median time from allo-SCT to steroid initiation was 39.5 days (14–183 days), and from steroid initiation to etanercept was 6 days.

Outcomes

Incidence of Grade 3 aGvHD was reduced from 43.3 to 11.5%, and Grade 4 from 20 to 19.2%. The outcomes are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2. Outcomes1

Overall response rate, %

83.3

aGvHD, acute graft-versus-host disease

*Responded best

Response status at Day 56 from initiation of steroids, n (%)

aGvHD site

Skin

Gut*

Liver

Complete

Partial

No response

Progression

3 (30)

4 (40)

3 (30)

3 (20)

10 (66.7)

 

2 (13.3)

3 (42.9)

2 (28.6)

 

2 (28.6)

Active infection within 6 months of transplant, %

93.3

Cause of death

Infection alone, n (%)

Infection + GvHD, n (%)

Infection + relapsed disease, n

 

7 (28)

7 (28)

1

Median overall survival, days (range)

Responders

Non-responders

 

306 (59–2005)

181 (89–261)

Conclusion

  • High response rates (83.3%) can be achieved using etanercept with or without ECP
  • Seven patients (26.9%) achieved a complete remission of their aGvHD
  • A high death rate due to infection in more than half of all patients is still a concern

Ruxolitinib plus ECP for SR aGvHD of the lower GI tract2

Modemann and colleagues investigated the tolerability and efficacy of the ruxolitinib and ECP combination in patients with SR aGvHD of the lower GI tract. The objective of the study was to increase response rates compared with ruxolitinib alone, and to investigate the impact of this treatment on regulatory T cells. Patient characteristics and the study design are shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Patient characteristics and study design2

Characteristic

N = 18

aCML, atypical chronic myeloid leukemia; aGvHD, acute GvHD; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; GI, gastrointestinal; GvHD, graft-versus-host disease; MDS, myelodysplastic syndromes; MM, multiple myeloma; MMUD, mismatched unrelated donor; MMUD, mismatched unrelated donor (9/10 HLA match); MRD, matched related donor; MUD, matched unrelated donor; PMF, primary myelofibrosis

Median age, years (range)

58.5 (21–73)

Additional site of GvHD (to lower GI tract)

None (n = 7)

Skin

Liver

Upper GI tract

Skin and liver

Liver and upper GI tract

Underlying disease (n)

 

AML (2), ALL (3), aCML (1), MDS (6), MM (1), PMF (5)

Donor source (n)

MUD (9), MRD (3), MMUD 9/10 (6)

Overall grade of aGvHD at start of ruxolitinib/ECP treatment (n)

III (9) IV (9)

 

All patients received 2 mg/kg of methylprednisolone when starting ruxolitinib or ECP. Median start dosage of ruxolitinib was 20 mg per day, given in 10 mg doses twice a day. The ECP treatment was initiated two times per week, for two weeks, and adjusted individually thereafter. While most patients received one ECP treatment per week, the number and duration of ECP ranged between 0.5 to 2.1 treatments (median, 20.5 per patient) and 0.4 to 23.4 months (median, 5.7 months), respectively.

Furthermore, calcineurin inhibitors were administered in all patients in addition to the study treatment and/or methylprednisolone; 17 patients also received mycophenolate mofetil.

Results

A summary of study results is shown below in Table 4.

Table 4. Study results2

Overall response, n (%)

Complete remission

Partial remission

No response

10 (56)

8 (44)

2 (11)

8 (44)

CMV, cytomegalovirus

Reasons to treatment cessation, n (%)

Cytopenia

Complete remission status

No treatment response

 

8 (44) (n = 3 recovered, n = 2 died)

6 (33)

2 (7)

Reasons to treatment discontinuation, n

Infections

Vomiting and emesis

Unknown

 

2

2

2

Side effects (Grade III and higher), n (%)

Thrombocytopenia

Leukopenia

Increased C-reactive protein level (> 50 mg/dL)

CMV reactivation

 

7 (39)

9 (50)

9 (50) (led to sepsis in 3 patients)

12 (67)

Overall survival

Results from the survival analysis are presented in Table 5.

Table 5. Survival results2

2-year overall survival, n (%)

10 (56)

aGvHD, acute graft-versus-host disease; GI, gastrointestinal

Median overall survival, months

15.3

Death events, n

Relapse of underlying disease

Severe therapy-refractory aGvHD of lower GI tract

Infection complications

8 (44%)

3

1

4

Immune status

Samples were analyzed before treatment, 4 weeks after treatment initiation, and 3–4 weeks after treatment cessation:

  • No significant changes in whole lymphocyte or CD4+ T helper cell counts at any of the three time points were observed
  • There was an increase in regulatory T cells during the treatment (p = 0.02), which decreased after stopping the treatment (p = 0.02)
  • High levels of regulatory T cells were also seen in patients with complete or partial response (p = 0.03)

Steroid tapering

The combination allowed tapering the dose of steroids; this was performed with a dose reduction by half in a maximum of 7 days, and by a quarter of initial dosage of methylprednisolone in a median time of 6 days (range, 1–12 days). Complete stopping of steroids was achieved in a median time of 27 days (range, 12–63).

Conclusions

  • A high number of responses could be achieved with the combination of ECP plus ruxolitinib resulting in improved survival, with a median overall survival rate of 18.4 months in responders, compared with 11.4 months in non-responders (p = 0.1)
  • Increased regulatory T-cell levels were measured during treatment which may be an indicator of potential efficacy in severe refractory aGvHD
  • Cytopenia was the major side effect, with anemia, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia of all grades seen in 13/18 patients
  • After a follow-up of 887 days, five patients remained in complete remission of their aGvHD, while four maintained their partial response, and only one patient relapsed indicating long-lasting effects. However, the fact that 12 patients developed chronic GvHD is a concern

 

Based on the results of the two studies, combining ECP with other agents appears to be effective; however, high infection rates and the risk of chronic GvHD remain a concern that needs to be carefully monitored.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content