The gvhd Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the gvhd Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The gvhd and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View gvhd content recommended for you
Standard initial therapy for patients with aGvHD typically consists of corticosteroids, such as methylprednisolone or prednisolone.1 A multicenter, open-label, randomized phase III trial (NCT04061876) assessed the safety and effectiveness of ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, in combination with methylprednisolone in patients with newly diagnosed intermediate- or high-risk aGvHD. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive ruxolitinib 5 mg/day plus methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg/day (n = 99) or methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg/day (n = 99). Results from this trial were published in Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy by Dou et al.1 |
Key learnings |
The ORR was higher in the ruxolitinib plus corticosteroid combination group compared with corticosteroids alone on Day 28 (92.9% vs 70.7%; OR, 5.8; 95% CI, 2.4–14.0; p <0.001) and on Day 56 (85.9% vs 46.5%; OR, 7.07; 95% CI, 3.36–15.75; p < 0.001). |
The ruxolitinib plus corticosteroid combination group showed improved 18-month failure-free survival vs corticosteroid alone (57.2% vs. 33.3%; HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.31–0.68; p < 0.001), suggesting a more durable response. |
Grade ≥3 AEs were similar between the two groups; however, fewer Grade 4 AEs were observed in the combination group (26.3% vs 50.5%; p = 0.005). |
Ruxolitinib treatment reduced corticosteroid exposure, potentially minimizing long-term immunosuppression without increasing infection rates. Abbreviations: CMV, cytomegalovirus; EFS, event-free survival; HCT, hematopoietic cell transplantation; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; NFT-BART, Nonparametric Failure Time Bayesian Additive Regression Trees; OS, overall survival. |
The addition of ruxolitinib to methylprednisolone was well tolerated and improved response rates and failure-free survival while not increasing steroid exposure, NRM, mortality, or infectious complications. |
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; aGvHD, acute graft-versus-host disease; CI, confidence interval; CIR, cumulative incidence of relapse; HR, hazard ratio; JAK, Janus kinase; NRM, non-relapsed mortality; OR, odds ratio; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content