All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
This month, the GvHD Hub are focusing on prognostic factors for Graft-versus-Host Disease (GvHD). To date, the following biomarkers have shown to predict GvHD outcomes:1
Organ damage:
Systemic:
This article summarizes some of the other prognostic factors that have been identified, contains video interviews with experts, and features highlights from upcoming presentations.
In February 2019, Biqi Zhou, and colleagues from The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, published a retrospective study analyzing 64 patients who underwent haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant (haplo-HSCT). Their aim was to investigate the prognostic impact of B7H1 and B7H3 in the development of aGvHD. A control group of 38 human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched patients was used. The authors analyzed the levels of B7H1, B7H3, PD1, soluble CD25, ST2 and TNFR1 levels on day zero, seven, 14 and 28 post-transplantation.
During the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) meeting in March 2019, Miriam Sanchez-Escamilla presented results from a trial evaluating the prognostic value of the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) for predicting aGvHD, as well as non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS).
In this study, higher EASIX scores on day 30, day 100 and at the onset of aGvHD were associated with higher NRM and inferior OS, as well as predicting the incidence of high-grade aGvHD.
Junghoon Shin and colleagues utilized proteome profiling to analyze plasma samples from patients undergoing allo-HSCT to identify protein biomarkers to predict the risk of aGvHD. The biomarkers identified as potential predictive markers and used as biomarker panel scores (range, 0–3) were; tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1, plastin-2 and regenerating islet derived protein 3-α.
In 2018, Armin Rashidi and colleagues published the results of an analysis of three biomarkers (citrulline, Reg3α, and intestinal fatty acid binding protein). The levels were evaluated pre-transplant on day seven, and then post-transplant on days seven and 28 in consecutive patients undergoing allo-HSCT.
In a study by Yuusaku Sugihara and colleagues, ileocolonoscopy was conducted to evaluate whether it can be used to predict the severity of aGvHD following allo-HSCT. This retrospective analysis of 51 patients was conducted following symptoms of abdominal pain, anorexia, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea.
Antibodies targeting Y-chromosome encoded proteins (HY antibodies), detected three months post-transplant in male HSCT recipients who received their transplant from a female donor, are significantly more likely to experience cGvHD. This multicenter, retrospective study evaluated the HY antibody levels in patients undergoing transplant to better determine this correlation. Serum samples of 234 patients were analyzed at three months and one year post-transplant for levels of the following HY antigens: DBY, UTY2, ZFY, RPS4Y, and EIF1AY.
During the 60th American Society of Hematology (ASH) meeting, Hao Dai presented data evaluating the role of the CXCR3 axis in cGvHD. Serum levels of CXCR3 ligands, including CXCL9, were evaluated pre-transplant and on day 28 post-transplant. Selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were then analyzed for their association with severe cGvHD.
Also, during this ASH meeting, the GvHD Hub spoke to Amit Kalra, University of Calgary, CA, regarding the early identification of patients at high risk of cGvHD after transplant. Watch the video below:
Amit Kalra | ASH 2018 | Early prediction of chronic GvHD
During the EBMT meeting in 2019, Kirk R Schultz presented results from the PBMTC 1202 / applied biomarkers in late effects of childhood cancer treatment (ABLE) study. This study analyzed the differences between pediatric late aGvHD and cGvHD by biomarker assessment at day 100 post-allo-HSCT.
In this study, a control group of patients who did not develop cGvHD (n= 123) was compared to an experimental group who developed cGvHD (n= 44) or late aGvHD (n= 58). The investigators tested biomarker levels within 96 hours of conditioning starting on day +100, at six and 12 months post-transplant, and at the onset of cGvHD.
The results showed:
During the Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (TCT) Meeting held in February 2019, John E. Levine presented data evaluating the predictive accuracy of different GvHD biomarker combinations. The analysis aimed to identify the optimal combination of biomarkers at GvHD onset to predict non-relapse mortality (NRM). All potential combinations of the following were assessed: REG3a, ST2, TNFR1, and TIM3.
During the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting & Exposition, San Diego, US, the GvHD Hub spoke to Yasuyuki Arai, Kyoto University, Kyoto, JP, about the creation of a GvHD risk prediction model using machine-learning algorithms. Watch the video below:
Yasuyuki Arai | ASH 2018 | The role of machine-learning algorithms in GvHD risk prediction
During the upcoming ASH meeting, several abstracts surrounding prognostic factors in GvHD are due to be presented. Highlights include:
Improving outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation is crucial. As GvHD remains the major cause of non-relapse mortality after transplant, being able to better predict its occurrence, severity and localization in a patient could help physicians and patients to make relevant treatment decisions earlier, such as the right choice of conditioning regimen, stem cell source, GvHD prophylaxis and supportive care.
Furthermore, these risk factors could help to identify meaningful eligibility and stratification criteria for clinical studies which would facilitate interpretation of results.
Finally, predictive factors for GvHD reveal a lot about the pathophysiology of this condition as can been seen by the number of risk factors which relate to the microbiome, endothelial integrity and immune system activity. All this could help to identify novel treatment options.
Therefore, predicting GvHD will eventually help improve outcome after allogeneic transplantation.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox