All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
During the GvHD Hub Steering Committee meeting, key opinion leaders met to discuss how to sequence agents for steroid-refractory chronic GvHD. This recorded discussion was chaired by Mohamad Mohty, and featured Hildegard Greinix, Yi-Bin Chen, Attilio Olivieri, Mutlu Arat, Arnon Nagler, Florent Malard, Bipin Savani, and Ali Bazarbachi.
How to sequence agents for steroid-refractory chronic GvHD
The members considered a case study presented by Mohamad Mohty and discussed their management strategies for this patient, weighing up the efficacy of alternative treatments. This case study is outlined in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Case study outline
aGvHD, acute GvHD; allo-HSCT, allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; cGvHD, chronic GvHD; CR1, complete response.
There are multiple appropriate treatments for this case, one being ruxolitinib due to its benefits in mucosal cGvHD as well its use to accelerate the tapering of previous steroid treatment. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) may also be considered, with recent clinical data suggesting ECP is particularly effective in skin and oral presentations of GvHD. A combination therapy of ruxolitinib and ECP has also been shown to be effective in this group and can serve to faster taper steroids. The most appropriate drug or combination (Figure 2) can be determined by the risk of relapse and any other individual considerations for the patient.
Figure 2. Treatment options for cutaneous mucosal presentations of steroid-refractory chronic GvHD
Certain variations to the case presentation may influence the management options. For example, ibrutinib is an alternative that may be considered for patients, particularly those with B-cell malignancies; however, other than in this specific patient group, ibrutinib is a lower priority option due to its reduced efficacy and higher toxicity in comparison with ruxolitinib.
In the case of cytopenia and cytomegalovirus reactivation, ECP would be more appropriate. Furthermore, the addition of moderate lung involvement to this scenario would indicate alternative treatments such as belumosudil, which has a slightly higher overall response rate in lung manifestations of cGvHD compared with ruxolitinib.1
Multiple options are available for the treatment of patients with steroid-refractory cGvHD. The most appropriate management strategies depend on the individual presentation of the patient, in particular the organ manifestations present and may include a singular therapy or a combination treatment regimen.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox