All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
The GvHD Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
Addition of ATG to standard prophylaxis reduces incidence of acute and chronic GvHD
By Ella Dixon
|
Addition of ATG to standard GvHD prophylaxis has been shown to reduce the incidence of acute and chronic GvHD; however, it may increase the risk of relapse.1 A retrospective, real-world, cohort study published by Bai et al.1 in Acta Haematologica compared ATG + standard GvHD prophylaxis (CSA + MTX) with the standard prophylaxis alone. The study included 210 patients undergoing unrelated donor allogeneic HSCT, of which 140 received ATG + CSA + MTX and 70 received CSA + MTX alone. The primary outcomes of the study were cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GvHD at 1- and 2-years post-HSCT.1
|
| Key learnings: |
|
The incidence of any grade aGvHD was significantly lower in patients treated with ATG vs those without (51.4% vs 70%; p = 0.010). The incidence of chronic GvHD at 1-year (36.4% vs 62.9%; p < 0.001) and 2-years (40.0% vs 65.7%; p < 0.001) post-allo-HSCT was lower in the ATG vs non-ATG group. |
|
GvHD-related mortality was lower in the ATG group (4.3% vs. 18.5%). However, the 2-year OS was similar between the ATG and non-ATG groups (65.0% vs 64.3%). In the ATG group, the rate of relapse post-HSCT was higher at 1-year (24.3% vs 14.3%; p = 0.09) and 2-years (31.4% vs 17.1%; p = 0.216) compared with the non-ATG group. |
|
ATG use did not increase the overall incidence of cytomegalovirus (p = 1.000) or Epstein-Barr virus reactivation (p = 0.104), although the number of patients requiring hospital admissions due to viral reactivations was higher in the ATG vs non-ATG groups (7 vs 0). |
|
Addition of ATG to standard GvHD prophylaxis effectively reduced GvHD incidence and severity, potentially improving GvHD-free survival. Tailoring ATG dosing and timing may optimize outcomes while mitigating relapse risk in patients undergoing allo-HSCT. |
Abbreviations: aGvHD, acute graft-versus-host disease; allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant; ATG, anti-thymocyte globulin; CSA, cyclosporine A; GvHD, graft-versus-host disease; MTX, methotrexate.
- Bai N, Limvorapitak W, Henderson R, et al. Real-world impact of routine addition of anti-thymocyte globulin to standard GvHD prophylaxis in myeloablative unrelated donor transplants: Important gains in graft vs host disease prevention though no difference in overall survival. Acta Hematol. 2024. Online ahead of print. DOI: 10.1159/000541071
Your opinion matters
3 votes - 63 days left ...
Related articles
Newsletter
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox