All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know GvHD.

  TRANSLATE

The GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The GVHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through independent educational grants from Incyte, Sanofi and Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

What approaches could improve recruitment and retention in cGvHD clinical trials?

By Beth Campbell

Share:

Featured:

Corey CutlerCorey Cutler

Oct 5, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to describe approaches that may improve recruitment and retention in chronic graft-versus-host disease clinical trials.


Do you know... Which of the following is NOT a widely accepted approach to improve recruitment and/or retention in cGvHD clinical trials?

The GvHD Hub was pleased to speak with Corey Cutler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, US. We asked, What approaches could improve recruitment and retention in cGvHD clinical trials?  

In this interview, Cutler discusses strategies to promote recruitment and retention of patients in chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) clinical trials. He highlights the importance of broad eligibility criteria, as well as opportunities for patients to participate in both therapeutic and non-therapeutic cGvHD research. He also emphasizes the need to consider the patient perspective when designing trials, including the time, travel, and assessment burden associated with participation. 

What approaches could improve recruitment and retention in cGvHD clinical trials?

Key points 

  • Broad eligibility criteria can support recruitment in cGvHD clinical trials by allowing patients across different clinical phenotypes and organ manifestations to participate.1,2 
  • This could include trials using a master protocol framework, which allow multiple therapeutic interventions to be evaluated within a single overarching protocol across different patient populations.3,4  
  • In addition to therapeutic clinical trials, patients should be made aware of opportunities to participate in non-therapeutic research, including natural history and longitudinal trials, which are important for advancing understanding of cGvHD.5 
  • Patient retention should be considered from the outset of trial design, with trial schedules designed to minimize the burden of participation by consolidating the number of in-person visits and, in turn, associated travel time for the patient.2 
  • Considering the patient perspective when designing trials can help ensure that study outcomes are relevant to their experiences.6 
  • Moreover, keeping patients informed about trial outcomes can help reinforce the value of their participation by demonstrating the contribution their involvement has made to the research and its potential benefits for future patients.7,8 
  • In summary, patient-centered trial design is key to improving recruitment and retention in cGvHD clinical trials, including eligibility criteria that reflect real-world practice and study procedures that minimize the logistical and assessment burden for participants.

This educational resource is independently supported by Sanofi. All content is developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee. Funders are allowed no influence. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content