All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Previous studies have shown that mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) may be a possible novel strategy for the treatment of steroid-resistant acute graft-versus-host disease (SR aGvHD). Despite these encouraging findings, clinicians are faced with the difficult task of choosing which patients will be either sensitive or resistant to therapy. In order to establish criteria for the use of MSCs, a study was conducted to analyze a cohort of SR aGvHD patients receiving MSCs in several centers in the United Kingdom. This retrospective study, published in the January edition of British Journal of Haematology, conducted by Antonio Galleu from King’s College, London, UK, and colleagues, used MSCs manufactured at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and administered for compassionate use.
In summary, this analysis showed that clinical responses at week 1 following MSC treatment may be a feasible early predictor of clinical outcome. Dr Galleu added that this data strengthened “the role of MSC recipient rather than the one of MSC donor or source in prediciting clinical responses.”
The use of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells holds great potentials to treat GvHD. So far more than 800 GvHD patients have been treated with MSCs with more than 1000 doses administered. Based on this experience, we can conclude that MSCs are safe and well tolerated, with no or minimal adverse reactions. Furthermore, despite the potent immunosuppressive activity, MSC use does not lead to an increase in both infection severity or frequency, or number of relapses in MSC treated patients.
Outcomes of patients treated with MSCs are encouraging but highly variable in the different studies reported in the literature, with response rates ranging from 33% to almost 100% in few studies. Importantly, OS higher than 50% at 2 years has been consistently reported in patients who responded to MSCs.
The results reported in our paper confirm that the achievement of any kind of response significantly prolong the OS of the patients, despite the very poor prognosis of the cohort treated. Importantly, the assessment of the response at one week after MSC treatment can be used as early predictor of treatment failure. Younger age, absence of liver involvement and higher MSC doses were associated with better response rates. If confirmed in controlled prospective studies, these data will guide to a better patient stratification and improvement of the administration regimen of MSCs in GvHD.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox