All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
The gvhd Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the gvhd Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The gvhd and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View GvHD content recommended for you
During the 67th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, December 6–9, 2025, Orlando, US, Everett Meyer presented subgroup results from the phase III Precision-T trial (NCT05316701) evaluating Orca-T vs tacrolimus (Tac) + methotrexate (MTX) as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis. The analysis examined clinical outcomes in prespecified patient subgroups including age and sex, donor type, disease type, disease risk, and conditioning regimen. The primary endpoint was chronic GvHD (cGvHD)-free survival (cGFS), which was compared between treatment groups for each subgroup.
Key data: In the intention-to-treat (ITT) cohorts, Orca-T had higher cGFS rates at 1 year vs Tac/MTX (78% vs 38%; p < 0.0001). In patients aged >50 years, cGFS rates at 1 year with Orca-T vs Tac/MTX were 74% vs 35% (p = 0.0071). Clinical outcomes favored Orca-T in patients >50 years of age, those with high pretransplant comorbidity scores, and those with high-risk disease scores.
Key learning: Orca-T demonstrates improved clinical outcomes overall and across patient subgroups with varied demographic and clinical features, suggesting Orca-T benefit extends to patients >50 years of age and those with high-risk disease.
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
What do you see as the main advantage of including ECP + Rux as an upfront combination?