All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.

The GvHD Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2019-07-01T11:54:27.000Z

EHA 2019 | The role of intestinal microbiota in graft-versus-host disease

Jul 1, 2019
Share:

Bookmark this article

At the 24th European Hematology Association (EHA) Congress in Amsterdam, Professor Ernst Holler from the University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany, gave an educational talk on Saturday 15 June, entitled “Microbiota and graft-versus-host disease: a double-edged sword”. He spoke about current approaches in microbiota research and how the view of researchers has changed on the pathophysiology of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)-related complications in recent years.1

Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remains the most prominent cause of mortality post-allogeneic HSCT. It has been shown that GvHD affects predominantly the gastrointestinal (GI) system and it is therefore not surprising that recent studies highlighted the important role of the gut microbiota in HSCT outcomes and in the development of GvHD.1

Key highlights

  • The influence of intestinal bacteria on inflammation in GvHD was first described by van Bekkum: germfree mice showed reduced GvHD2 while the presence of bacterial lipopolysaccharide enhanced the GvHD reaction3
  • The 16s molecular sequencing of gut microbiota in patients undergoing allo-HSCT was first described by researchers from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center4 and later on by Holler’s group as well5. It helped to identify a large group of anaerobic commensal bacteria that had not been integrated into the microbiota-host interaction before
    • Both studies concluded that the loss of commensal bacteria, as well as bacterial diversity in the first two weeks post-HSCT, are associated with a higher risk of GvHD development and transplant mortality
    • Antibiotic prophylaxis, used as a standard of care for prophylaxis of infections and also in GvHD, often leads to loss of microbiota diversity and is now considered as the major cause of dysbiosis and causes an abundance of single pathogenic bacteria6
    • However, certain antibiotics seem to spare commensal bacteria such as rifaximin and vancomycin
  • Changes in the microbiota during the first two weeks after HSCT can exert a long-lasting impact on the outcome as dysbiosis negatively affect the rebuilding of the immune system by donor cells and their tolerance to host cells. This is similar to the development of the immune system in newborn where dysbiosis predisposes to autoimmune disease7
  • Swimm et al., found that there is strong protection in GvHD-related pathology and improved survival in mice receiving indole-carbaldehyde prophylaxis without interference with GvL effects8
  • The axis of microbiota, microbiota-derived metabolites, and GI regulatory T cells seems to be a predominant mechanism in the regulation of GvHD and may equally affect graft-versus-leukemia response
  • The presence of specific bacteria protects against relapse and thus supports the general concept that intestinal microbiota also regulate antitumor immunosurveillance1,9

Antibiotics

Prebiotics

Probiotics

Postbiotics

Complete gut decontamination

Non-digestible carbohydrates

Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT)

Short-chain fatty acids

Rifaximin

Avoidance or encouragements of certain food

Engineered microbes

Indole derivates

Commensal regimens

 

Rationally selected strains

Avoidance of food that compromises the mucus barrier

Timing of initiation or discontinuation of prophylaxis and empiric treatment

 

 

 

Table 1: Microbiota based prophylaxis and treatment1

Take home messages

  • Currently, the most direct approach to restore commensal bacteria and microbiota diversity is FMT1. FMT seems to be safe and effective for patients undergoing HSCT9,10, however, further clinical trials are required
  • It should be further evaluated whether the mechanism of healthy donor FMT is based on unknown bacterial strains or works via other metabolic effects provided by a healthy microbiota
  • Antibiotic stewardship needs to consider microbiota modulation in the future by:
    • Protecting the intestinal microbiome by antibacterial peptides
  • Neutralizing antibiotics in the gut using oral enzymes
  • Further studies needed on chronic GvHD occurring at sites with specific microbiota or epithelial interactions
  1. Holler E. Microbiota and graft-versus-host disease: a double-edged sword. 24th European Hematology Association (EHA) Congress. 2019 June 15. Amsterdam. 
  2. van Bekkum DW. et al., Mitigation of secondary disease of allogeneic mouse radiation chimeras by modification of the intestinal microflora. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1974;52:401–404. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/52.2.401
  3. Ferrara JL. et al., Graft-versus-host disease. Lancet. 2009;373:1550–1561.DOI: 10.1016/S0140-67367-3
  4. Jenq RR. et al., Regulation of intestinal inflammation by microbiota following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. J Exp Med. 2012;209:903–911.  10.1084/jem.20112408
  5. Holler E. et al., Metagenomic analysis of the stool microbiome in patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplantation: loss of diversity is associated with use of systemic antibiotics and more pronounced in gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20:640–645. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.01.030
  6. Andermann TM. et al., The microbiome and hematopoietic cell transplantation: past, present, and future. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018;24:1322–1340. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018
  7. Torow N. & Hornef MW. The neonatal window of opportunity: setting the stage for life-long host-microbial interaction and immune homeostasis. J Immunol. 2017;198:557–563. DOI:10.4049/jimmunol.1601253.
  8. Swimm A. et al., Indoles derived from intestinal microbiota act via type I interferon signalling to limit graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2018;132:2506–2519. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-03-838193
  9. Haak BW. et al., Impact of gut colonization with butyrate-producing microbiota on respiratory viral infection following allo-HCT. Blood. 2018;131:2978–2986. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-01-828996
  10. Taur Y. et al., Reconstitution of the gut microbiota of antibiotic-treated patients by autologous fecal microbiota transplant. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10:pii: eaap9489. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aap9489.

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox