All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
It is known that the administration of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) effectively prevents graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD) after haploidentical stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Nonetheless, data in matched sibling and unrelated donor SCT are still scarce.
On Wednesday 27 March 2019, Oral Session 10 (OS10) took place at the 45th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), Frankfurt, DE. During this session, abstract OS10-8 was presented by Irene García-Cadenas from the Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, ES, discussed the role of incorporating PT-Cy-based prophylaxis as a standard-of-care (SoC) in HLA matched siblings or unrelated donor transplantation for patients with an increased risk of GvHD.
Characteristics (N = 44 ) |
N (%) |
Age, median (range) |
56 (19–67) |
Sex, male |
22 (50) |
|
|
Baseline diseases |
|
AML and MDS |
24 (54) |
NHL/Hodgkin |
10 (23) |
MPN/CML |
10 (23) |
Others |
4 (9) |
|
|
Advanced disease at transplant |
11 (25) |
|
|
Donor type |
|
Identical sibling |
15 (34) |
URD (0 or 1 HLA mismatch) |
11/18 (25/41) |
|
|
EBMT risk of index: high |
16 (36) |
|
|
Conditioning regimen |
|
Fludarabine – Busulfan (RIC) |
16 (36) |
Fludarabine – Melphalan (RIC) |
13 (30) |
MiniThiotepa-modified RICs |
8 (18) |
Fludarabine – TBI (8 or 13.5 Gy) (MAC) |
7 (16) |
|
|
Stem cell source: PB |
43 (98) |
|
|
Second immunosuppressive agent: tacrolimus/sirolimus |
40/4 (91)/(9) |
|
|
CD34+ infused cells (x10 E6), median (range) |
5.1 (1.6–7.4) |
Median follow-up: 365 days (range: 64–959)
Dr. García-Cadenas concluded the session by confirming the feasibility of RIC allo-SCT with PT-Cy in combination tacrolimus or sirolimus as immunosuppressive drugs for patients at high risk of GvHD. The data showed that there was a high rate of GF in period one where “classical” allo-RIC were performed, however, GF appears to be lower when mini-Thiotepa was introduced. Dr. García-Cadenas highlighted that these data are not representative and requires a larger cohort for validation. The current results suggest that PT-Cy could pave the way to improving the quality of life of transplant survivors by significantly reducing severe GvHD.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox