All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Despite its curative potential, allo-HCT is still hampered by a high non-relapse mortality (NRM) and the risk for severe acute GvHD. Methods to predict and eventually prevent these complications are warranted.
On 25 March 2019, Oral Session 1 (OS2) took place at the 45th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), Frankfurt, DE. During this session, Miriam Sanchez-Escamilla, from the IDIVAL (Research Institute of Marques de Valdecilla), presented validated results of the prognostic value of the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX), in adult patients undergoing unmodified or CD34-selected allo-HCT.
The objective of this study was to assess the validity of the EASIX score to predict non-relapse mortality (NRM), acute GvHD and overall survival (OS) during allo-HCT.
|
Predicting OS |
|
Univariant analysis |
HR (95% CI) |
P value |
Pre-EASIX |
1.17 (1.02–1.35) |
0.022 |
EASIX d30 |
1.54 (1.37–1.74) |
<0.001 |
EASIX d100 |
1.52 (1.34–1.72) |
<0.001 |
EASIX-aGvHD |
1.27 (1.09–1.48) |
0.003 |
Table 1: EASIX predicts lower OS
|
Predicting NRM |
|
Univariant analysis |
HR (95% CI) |
P value |
Pre-EASIX |
1.05 (0.94–1.18) |
0.394 |
EASIX d30 |
1.33 (1.20–1.47) |
<0.001 |
EASIX d100 |
1.36 (1.23–1.51) |
<0.001 |
EASIX-aGvHD |
1.16 (1.01–1.33) |
0.032 |
Table 2: EASIX predicts lower NRM
|
Predicting grades of aGvHD |
|
|
|
Grade |
HR (95% CI)
|
P value |
Pre-EASIX |
I–IV II–IV III–IV |
1.09 (0.98–1.21) 1.07 (0.95–1.21) 1.23 (1.01–1.50) |
0.106 0.257 0.044 |
Table 3: Pre-EASIX predicts grade III-IV aGvHD
Dr. Sanchez-Escamilla concluded that a higher EASIX scores at day 30, day 100, and at the onset of aGvHD are associated with higher NRM and inferior OS with a more prominent association in patients receiving unmodified allo-HCT compared to patients receiving CD34-selected allo-HCT. Furthermore, a high EASIX score before allo-HCT predicted high-grade acute GvHD.
The study identified that endothelial damage is a significant contributor to poorer outcomes after allo-HCT. The study validated that the EASIX formula delivers an easy complimentary tool to predict outcomes in these patients.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox