All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.

  TRANSLATE

The gvhd Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the gvhd Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The gvhd and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Donor selection for allo-HSCT: NMDP/CIBMTR guidelines

By Nathan Fisher

Share:

Jan 28, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in GvHD.


Guidelines from the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) and the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) donor selection, in the context of novel graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis approaches, were recently published in Transplantation and Cellular Therapy by Jimenez Jimenez et al.

Key data: Concurrent donor searches using search prognosis scores – based on patient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and ancestry, rather than sequential approaches – are recommended, as HLA-matched unrelated donors (MUDs) and HLA-mismatched unrelated donors (MMUDs) have shown comparable outcomes when post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based GvHD prophylaxis is used. When selecting between MMUDs and available haploidentical donor sources, absence of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA), donor availability, and younger donor age should be considered. Donors aged ≤30 years should be prioritized to maximize overall survival (OS).

Key learning: Advances in GvHD prophylaxis have improved outcomes in alternative donor allo-HSCT; therefore, contemporary donor selection should shift from strict HLA-matching hierarchies to integrated strategies, considering both HLA compatibility and non-HLA factors, including donor age.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

Which consideration most strongly guides your decision to escalate therapy in SR-aGvHD?