All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
T-cell depletion with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) has become an important part of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis in the setting of matched related donor transplantation. Recently, the use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (allo-HSCT) from haploidentical donors has been shown to be effective at reducing the risk of acute GvHD (aGvHD) and chronic GvHD (cGvHD) in this setting. It has been suggested that PTCy may also be feasible in alternative transplant settings.
The Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) sought to compare the GvHD prophylaxis regimens, ATG vs PTCy, in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving allo-HSCT from HLA-identical siblings. The data from the retrospective analysis were recently published in Cancer, and the GvHD Hub is pleased to provide a summary.
A retrospective study by the ALWP of the EBMT involving over 600 transplant centers, to compare ATG with PTCy as GvHD prophylaxis in adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) undergoing HLA-identical sibling allo-HSCT for the treatment of AML. Patients were in their first complete remission at the time of allo-HSCT and received their first allo-HSCT between 2008 and 2018. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of GvHD.
A total of 2,110 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis (ATG, n = 1,913; PTCy, n = 197). Patient characteristics are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Patient characteristics1
allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; ATG, antithymocyte globulin; PTCy, posttransplant cyclophosphamide. *The cytogenetic risk was defined according to the refined UK Medical Research Council criteria. Significant differences between groups are shown in bold. |
|||
Characteristic |
ATG (n = 1,913) |
PTCy (n = 197) |
p value |
Median age at allo-HCT, years (range) |
54 (18–72) |
47 (18–74) |
< 0.01 |
Male sex, % |
53 |
55 |
0.55 |
Female donor into male recipient, % |
24 |
26 |
0.55 |
Cytogenetic risk, %* |
|
|
0.51 |
Good |
3 |
4 |
|
Intermediate |
45 |
44 |
|
Poor |
19 |
15 |
|
NA/failed |
33 |
37 |
|
Karnofsky performance status < 90% |
24 |
21 |
0.39 |
Patient cytomegalovirus serology, % |
|
|
< 0.01 |
Positive |
70 |
80 |
|
Negative |
30 |
20 |
|
Interval from diagnosis to allo-HSCT, months (range) |
4.8 (1–18) |
4.3 (1–17) |
< 0.01 |
Median year of allo-HSCT (range) |
2014 (2008–2018) |
2015 (2009–2018) |
< 0.01 |
Conditioning regimen |
|
|
< 0.01 |
Myeloablative |
48 |
59 |
|
Reduced intensity |
52 |
41 |
|
Source of stem cells |
|
|
< 0.01 |
Bone marrow |
5 |
30 |
|
Peripheral blood stem cells |
95 |
70 |
|
Median follow-up, months (range) |
28 (12–54) |
19 (5–34) |
< 0.01 |
Table 2. Outcomes in patients receiving ATG vs PTCy prophylaxis with HLA-identical sibling allo-HSCT for the treatment of AML1
aGvHD, acute graft-versus-host disease; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; ATG, antithymocyte globulin; cGvHD, chronic GvHD; GRFS, GvHD/relapse-free survival; LFS, leukemia-free survival; OS, overall survival; PTCy, posttransplant cyclophosphamide. Significant differences between groups are shown in bold. |
|||
Outcomes, % |
ATG (n = 1,913) |
PTCy (n = 197) |
p value |
aGvHD |
|
|
|
Grade 2–4 |
17 |
19 |
0.81 |
Grade 3/4 |
6 |
6 |
0.91 |
cGvHD |
|
|
|
All grades |
30 |
37 |
0.02 |
Extensive |
12 |
16 |
< 0.01 |
Median time to engraftment, days |
17 |
20 |
< 0.01 |
LFS at 2 years |
58 |
55 |
0.75 |
GRFS at 2 years |
49 |
44 |
0.20 |
OS at 2 years |
65 |
64 |
0.61 |
In the allo-HSCT setting, GvHD can be hugely debilitating and represents one of the main influencers of impaired quality of life and survival. Overall, encouraging rates of both aGvHD and cGvHD were observed in this study compared with those obtained using conventional immunosuppressive agents such as cyclosporine A plus either methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil. The results from this study support the use of PTCy as an alternative option to ATG in the HLA-identical setting. The use of ATG yielded lower cumulative incidences of cGvHD, however, only when it was used in association with one additional immunosuppressive drug. This confirms previous results showing improved GvHD rates when using combinations of drugs as GvHD prophylaxis.
The authors noted the retrospective nature of this analysis and the low number of patients treated with PTCy as limitations of the study, suggesting that important influencing factors may have been disregarded. Furthermore, there was a lack of information regarding the rationale behind GvHD prophylaxis choices made by the treating physician.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox