All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.

The GvHD Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.

The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

2020-12-15T09:04:15.000Z

Comparable outcomes for GvHD prophylaxis with PTCy or ATG in patients with AML transplanted from matched sibling donors

Dec 15, 2020
Share:

Bookmark this article

T-cell depletion with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) has become an important part of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis in the setting of matched related donor transplantation. Recently, the use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (allo-HSCT) from haploidentical donors has been shown to be effective at reducing the risk of acute GvHD (aGvHD) and chronic GvHD (cGvHD) in this setting. It has been suggested that PTCy may also be feasible in alternative transplant settings.

 

The Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) sought to compare the GvHD prophylaxis regimens, ATG vs PTCy, in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving allo-HSCT from HLA-identical siblings. The data from the retrospective analysis were recently published in Cancer, and the GvHD Hub is pleased to provide a summary.

Study design

A retrospective study by the ALWP of the EBMT involving over 600 transplant centers, to compare ATG with PTCy as GvHD prophylaxis in adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) undergoing HLA-identical sibling allo-HSCT for the treatment of AML. Patients were in their first complete remission at the time of allo-HSCT and received their first allo-HSCT between 2008 and 2018. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of GvHD.

Patient characteristics

A total of 2,110 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis (ATG, n = 1,913; PTCy, n = 197). Patient characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Patient characteristics1

allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; ATG, antithymocyte globulin; PTCy, posttransplant cyclophosphamide.

*The cytogenetic risk was defined according to the refined UK Medical Research Council criteria.

Significant differences between groups are shown in bold.

Characteristic

ATG (n = 1,913)

PTCy (n = 197)

p value

Median age at allo-HCT, years (range)

54 (18–72)

47 (18–74)

< 0.01

Male sex, %

53

55

0.55

Female donor into male recipient, %

24

26

0.55

Cytogenetic risk, %*

 

 

0.51

Good

3

4

 

Intermediate

45

44

 

Poor

19

15

 

NA/failed

33

37

 

Karnofsky performance status < 90%

24

21

0.39

Patient cytomegalovirus serology, %

 

 

< 0.01

Positive

70

80

 

Negative

30

20

 

Interval from diagnosis to allo-HSCT, months (range)

4.8 (1–18)

4.3 (1–17)

< 0.01

Median year of allo-HSCT (range)

2014 (2008–2018)

2015 (2009–2018)

< 0.01

Conditioning regimen

 

 

< 0.01

Myeloablative

48

59

 

Reduced intensity

52

41

 

Source of stem cells

 

 

< 0.01

Bone marrow

5

30

 

Peripheral blood stem cells

95

70

 

Median follow-up, months (range)

28 (12–54)

19 (5–34)

< 0.01

Results

GvHD

  • Neutrophil engraftment was 99.5% across both groups, however, the time to engraftment was significantly longer in the PTCy treatment group (Table 2).
  • Levels of aGvHD were comparable between groups, but the incidence of cGvHD was lower in patients treated with ATG vs PTCy (Table 2).
  • Multivariate analysis confirmed that the risk of cGvHD was lower in patients who received ATG vs PTCY:
    • All-grade GvHD: HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52–0.97 (p < 0.04)
    • Extensive cGvHD: HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38–0.93 (p < 0.03)
  • However, these lower rates of cGvHD were only seen in patients who received one additional immunosuppressive drug in association with ATG. Patients receiving ≥ 2 associated drugs demonstrated no difference between ATG and PTCy.
  • Positive cytomegalovirus serology and female donor to male recipient were independently associated with a higher risk of Grade 2–4 aGvHD and a higher risk of cGvHD, respectively.
  • Results for aGvHD and cGvHD rates were confirmed in a pair-matched analysis.
  • Of the patients in the ATG and PTCy groups, 33% and 29% died, respectively.
    • The primary cause of death was disease recurrence: 56% in the ATG group and 58% in the PTCy group.
    • Deaths related to infection or GvHD were reported in 4% and 6%, respectively, across both groups.
  • The 2-year relapse incidence and non-relapse mortality rates were comparable between the two groups.

Patient outcomes

  • At 2 years, leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), and GvHD/relapse-free survival (GRFS) were not significantly different between patients who received ATG vs PTCY (Table 2).
  • Factors associated with lower LFS, OS, and GRFS:
    • Incremental age of 10 years
    • Secondary AML diagnosis
    • Poor karyotype
  • The use of peripheral blood stem cells was associated longer LFS, OS, and GRFS.
  • A Karnofsky performance status of ≥ 90% was associated with longer LFS.

Table 2. Outcomes in patients receiving ATG vs PTCy prophylaxis with HLA-identical sibling allo-HSCT for the treatment of AML1

aGvHD, acute graft-versus-host disease; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; ATG, antithymocyte globulin; cGvHD, chronic GvHD; GRFS, GvHD/relapse-free survival; LFS, leukemia-free survival; OS, overall survival; PTCy, posttransplant cyclophosphamide.

Significant differences between groups are shown in bold.

Outcomes, %

ATG (n = 1,913)

PTCy (n = 197)

p value

aGvHD

 

 

 

Grade 2–4

17

19

0.81

Grade 3/4

6

6

0.91

cGvHD

 

 

 

All grades

30

37

0.02

Extensive

12

16

< 0.01

Median time to engraftment, days

17

20

< 0.01

LFS at 2 years

58

55

0.75

GRFS at 2 years

49

44

0.20

OS at 2 years

65

64

0.61

Conclusion

In the allo-HSCT setting, GvHD can be hugely debilitating and represents one of the main influencers of impaired quality of life and survival. Overall, encouraging rates of both aGvHD and cGvHD were observed in this study compared with those obtained using conventional immunosuppressive agents such as cyclosporine A plus either methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil. The results from this study support the use of PTCy as an alternative option to ATG in the HLA-identical setting. The use of ATG yielded lower cumulative incidences of cGvHD, however, only when it was used in association with one additional immunosuppressive drug. This confirms previous results showing improved GvHD rates when using combinations of drugs as GvHD prophylaxis.

 

The authors noted the retrospective nature of this analysis and the low number of patients treated with PTCy as limitations of the study, suggesting that important influencing factors may have been disregarded. Furthermore, there was a lack of information regarding the rationale behind GvHD prophylaxis choices made by the treating physician.

  1. Battipaglia G, Labopin M, Hamladji RM, et al. Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide versus antithymocyte globulin in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation from HLA-identical sibling donors: A retrospective analysis from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Cancer. 2020. Online ahead of print. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33255

Your opinion matters

HCPs, what is your preferred format for educational content on the GvHD Hub?
8 votes - 24 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox