All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Both thymoglobulin (ATG) and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) have been used as monotherapy for GvHD prophylaxis, resulting in reduced rates of aGvHD and cGvHD. However, there is currently no research into whether the drugs can be combined safely to prevent GvHD.
On 29 March 2019, Shruti Prem, from the Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, CA, and colleagues published their findings on the combination of ATG and PTCy for GvHD prophylaxis. This combination was evaluated in patients who had received matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplants and mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) transplants.
Diagnosis |
MUD, N = 76 (%) |
MMUD, N = 26 (%) |
AML |
40 (52.6) |
15 (57.7) |
ALL |
4 (5.3) |
1 (3.8) |
MDS |
14 (18.4) |
6 (23.1) |
MPN |
8 (10.5) |
1 (3.8) |
Lymphoma |
5 (6.6) |
1 (3.8) |
CMML |
3 (3.9) |
0 (0) |
CML |
2 (2.6) |
2 (7.7) |
Table 1: Baseline characteristics of patients in each group. AML: Acute myeloid leukemia; ALL: Acute lymphoid leukemia; MDS: Myelodysplastic syndrome; MPN: Myeloproliferative Neoplasm; CMML: Chronic myelo-monocytic leukemia; CML: Chronic myeloid leukemia
Group |
OS (%) |
CI |
MUD |
75 |
95% CI; 64%—83% |
MMUD |
50 |
95% CI; 55%—76% |
Table 2: OS in MUD and MMUD after a median follow-up of 15 months (range 0.6—33 months)
Group |
OS (%) |
CI |
MUD |
67 |
95% CI; 30%—67% |
MMUD |
35 |
95% CI; 17.5%—52.5% |
Table 3: PFS in MUD and MMUD after a median follow-up of 15 months (range 0.6—33 months)
The GvHD data for each donor type is presented in table 4. Median time to onset of aGvHD was 66 days, with skin (78%) being the most commonly affected site followed by the gut (33%) and the liver (33%). The median time to onset of cGvHD was 188 days. The liver, skin and mouth were equally the most common sites of cGvHD (33% each).
GvHD |
MUD (n=76) |
MMUD (n=26) |
aGvHD grade II—IV |
24 (31.6%) |
4 (15.3%) |
aGvHD grade III—IV |
9 (11.8%) |
1 (3.8%) |
Steroid refractory aGvHD |
1 (1.3%) |
0 (0%) |
cGvHD |
16 (21%) |
3 (11.4%) |
NIH moderate/severe cGvHD |
8 (10.5%) |
2 (7.6%) |
Table 4: GvHD data for each donor group.
The combination of PTCy and ATG for patients with GvHD prophylaxis undergoing MUD PBSCTs results in low rates of Grade III/IV aGvHD and cGvHD. This combination has an acceptable safety profile, with an adequate NRM and relapse rates, however, patients may need to be monitored for viral infections and may require adjustments of the ATG dose. A prospective randomized study is warranted to compare the combination of PTCy and ATG, with PTCy alone.
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox