All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
The GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Awais Ijaz from the University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA, and colleagues retrospectively evaluated the safety, efficacy and risks of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in patients with hematological malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). CPIs can enhance graft versus tumor (GVT) effect, whereas the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) may increase. The study was published in Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation.
Twenty-four articles (13 case reports and 11 original manuscripts) were selected from PubMed regarding CPIs administered for patients with hematological malignancies either before or after allo-HSCT.
The authors concluded that the rate of acute GvHD was high (56%) in patients who received CPI therapy prior to allo-HSCT. They added that “this rate is higher than the historical incidence that ranges between 26% to 50%.” In addition, CPIs received after allo-HSCT led to superior efficacy, but also increased the risk of GvHD (14% acute, 9% chronic). The study group further stated that “there is need for extreme caution while making decisions regarding the use of CPI.” Further prospective clinical trials are required to confirm these findings.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox