All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.

The GvHD Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2024-03-19T15:39:32.000Z

Biomarkers and risk factors in flares of aGvHD: MAGIC analysis

Mar 19, 2024
Share:
Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in acute graft-versus-host disease.

Bookmark this article

Patients who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) are at risk of developing acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD).1 The current standard first-line treatment for aGvHD is systemic steroids.1 However, aGvHD symptoms often flare in patients upon tapering or discontinuation of steroids.1 The lack of data available for incidence, clinical presentations, and outcomes of aGvHD flares, and the absence of a standardized definition for GvHD flares makes it challenging to assess patients at risk of these occurrences.1

Focusing on the use of serum biomarkers, below, we summarize data evaluating flares of aGVHD in the Mount Sinai Acute GvHD International Consortium (MAGIC) analysis, published by Akahoshi et al.1 in Blood Advances.

Study design1

  •  A retrospective study of adult and pediatric patients who received allo-HCT at 23 international allo-HCT centers in North America, Europe, and Asia, between 2014 and 2021.
  • Patients were eligible for this study if they achieved complete response (CR) or very good partial response (VGPR) to systemic steroid treatment, within 4 weeks without primary disease relapse.
  • The definition of aGvHD flare was defined according to expert consensus in the Mount Sinai Acute GvHD International Consortium.
  • Serum samples were collected at the initial achievement of CR/VGPR.
  • The MAGIC algorithm probability was calculated as a value between 0.001 and 0.999.
  • Validated thresholds for Ann Arbor (AA) scores were used (AA1 < 0.14; 0.14  AA2 < 0.29; AA3 ≥ 0.29).

Key findings1

  • In total, 968 patients were included in this study.
  • The cumulative incidence of flares after CR/VGPR at 6 months was 21.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.0–24.2%).
  • Patients with Grade 3–4 GvHD, at the time of flare, were more likely to experience non-relapse mortality than those with Grade 1–2 GvHD (47% vs 12%; p<0.001).
  • After measuring the MAGIC algorithm probability score in all patients at CR/VGPR, the cumulative incidence of eventual flares increased with each AA score increase (Figure 1.).

Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of flares measured by MAPs at CR/VGPR* 

AA, Ann Arbor; CR, complete response; MAP, Mount Sinai Acute GvHD International Consortium algorithm predictor; VGPR, very good partial response.
*Data from Akahoshi, et al.1

  • Patients whose steroids were tapered rapidly were nearly twice as likely to experience a flare compared with patients who were tapered slowly (30% vs 17%; p < 0.001).
  • In patients who developed Grade 3–4 GvHD, the severity of flare and proportion of patients with lower gastrointestinal involvement (Stage 2–4) increased with each increase of AA score (Table 1).

Table 1. Severity and LGI involvement measured by MAPs at CR/VGPR*

 

AA1

AA2

AA3

Severity, %

5.4

11.4

20.0

Lower GI involvement, %

4.9

9.9

18.0

AA, Ann Arbor; CR, complete response; GI, gastrointestinal; LGI, lower GI; MAP, Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium algorithm predictor; VGPR, very good partial response.
*Data from Akahoshi, et al.1


Key learnings1

  • The use of MAGIC biomarkers at CR/VGPR can help to predict flares of GvHD.
  • The MAGIC biomarkers have the potential to guide future treatment strategies, including steroid tapering, in patients with GvHD.

  1. Akahoshi Y, Spyrou N, Hoepting M, et al. Flares of acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD): A Mount Sinai acute GvHD international consortium (MAGIC) analysis. Blood Adv. 2024. Online ahead of print. DOI: 1182/bloodadvances.2023012091.

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox