All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
On Saturday, June 1 2019, during the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting in Chicago, US, Uday R. Popat, from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, discussed the results of a prospective phase II study (NCT02861417), evaluating post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) in matched and haploidentical transplant recipients receiving a myeloablative fractionated busulfan conditioning regimen.1
There is an unmet need for a myeloablative conditioning regimen that reduced relapse rates without increasing Graft-versus-Host Disease (GvHD) related non-relapse mortality. Dr. Popat discussed how timed sequential busulfan (TSB) with fludarabine (Flu) is a promising myeloablative regimen for patients undergoing matched sibling (MSD) or unrelated (MUD) donor transplantation (HCT) with low non-relapse mortality (NRM), which has until now not been tested in haploidentical (haplo) donor transplantation.
|
N = 55 |
Percentage % |
Diagnosis |
||
AML/MDS |
30 |
55 |
CML/MPD |
9 |
16 |
Lymphoma |
5 |
9 |
Myeloma |
5 |
9 |
ALL |
6 |
11 |
Age, median (range) |
47 |
15-65 |
Comorbidity score > 2 |
22 |
40 |
Disease Risk Index |
||
High |
18 |
32 |
Intermediate |
32 |
58 |
Low |
5 |
9 |
Donor |
||
Matched Related |
11 |
20 |
Haploidentical related |
26 |
47 |
Matched Unrelated |
18 |
33 |
Cell source |
|
|
Peripheral blood |
26 |
31 |
Bone Marrow |
29 |
35 |
|
Results (N = 55) |
95% CI |
OS, 1 yr. in all patients |
71 % |
(60-84%) |
OS, 1 yr. after MSD HCT (n =11) |
91 % |
(75-100 %) |
OS, 1 yr. after MUD HCT (n =18) |
72 % |
(54-96 %) |
OS, 1 yr. after haplo HCT (n =26) |
62 % |
(45-83%) |
PFS, 1 yr. |
63 % |
(51-77 %) |
Relapse, 1 yr. |
17 % |
(7-27%) |
NRM, 1 year |
20 % |
(9-31 %) |
Acute GVHD II-IV |
38 % |
(25-51 %) |
Acute GVHD III-IV |
9 % |
(1-17 %) |
Chronic GVHD, 1 yr. |
10 % |
(2-18 %) |
Extensive Chronic GVHD |
8 % |
(0-15 %) |
Graft failure |
0 % |
0 % |
|
Grade 3 |
Grade 4 |
Grade 5 |
Total (%) |
Neutropenic Fever |
32 |
0 |
0 |
32 (58) |
Infections |
12 |
1 |
5 |
18 (33) |
Mucositis |
13 |
1 |
0 |
14 (25) |
Bilirubin |
6 |
1 |
0 |
7 (13) |
Pneumonia |
4 |
2 |
0 |
6 (11) |
Pulmonary |
1 |
3 |
1 |
5 (9) |
VOD |
3 |
0 |
1 |
4 (7) |
Hemorrhagic Cystitis |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4 (7) |
*Only ≥ 2 total events per system were considered in the study
Dr. Popat concluded that myeloablative fractioned busulfan conditioning combined with PT-Cy GvHD prophylaxis seems to reduce both, the incidence of severe acute and chronic GvHD and relapse rate in the haplo HCT setting and needs to be studied further.
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox