TRANSLATE

The gvhd Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the gvhd Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The gvhd and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Analysis of ruxolitinib as salvage therapy in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease

By Anna Bartus

Share:

Sep 13, 2018


Corticosteroids are the accepted first-line therapy for chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD), a major complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Nevertheless, 50–60% of these patients develop steroid-refractory GvHD (SR-GvHD), which is associated with poor survival rates. In order to improve patient outcomes, new second-line therapy options are required.

Badri Modi from Department of Surgery, Division of Dermatology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA, and colleagues retrospectively evaluated patients with GvHD treated with ruxolitinib as salvage therapy. The study was published ahead of print in Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Patients and methods

  • N = 46 patients
  • Median age = 49 years (range, 21–77)
  • Follow-up duration: March 2016 – February 2018
  • Patients received HSCT between July 1994 and April 2015
  • GvHD
    • GvHD severity: 35 patients had severe and 8 patients moderate disease
    • Organ involvement: 63% (n=29) of cases had severe skin disease, the oral cavity was involved in 32.6% (n=15) of patients, eyes in 47.8% (n=22) of patients, lungs in 21.7% (n=10) of cases, and joints/fascia in 47.8% (n=22) of patients
  • Study endpoints: organ specific responses, mean prednisone dose, as well as probability of ruxolitinib’s treatment failure-free survival (FFS), defined as absence of initiating additional systemic therapy, relapsed malignancy, medication intolerance, or death

Key findings

At 6 months of ruxolitinib therapy:

  • Complete response (CR) rate: 10% (n=5)
  • Partial response (PR) rate: 37% (n=17)
  • Stable disease: 15% (n=7)

At 12 months of ruxolitinib therapy:

  • Overall response rate (ORR): 43.4%
    • CR: 13% (n=6)
    • PR: 30% (n=14)
    • Stable disease: 15% (n=5)
  • Organ response:
    • 25% (n=10) of patients with skin involvement
    • 60% (n=15) of patients with mouth involvement
    • 26% (n=23) of patients with eyes involvement
    • 10% (n=1) of patients with lung involvement
    • 41% (n=23) of patients with joints / fascia involvement
  • Treatment failure: 45.7% of patients (n=21)
  • FFS: 54.2% (95% CI, 0.388–0.673)
  • Ruxolitinib use significantly associated with lower prednisone dose at 1 year compared to the baseline dose
  • 52% of patients developed infections which led to higher overall mortality rates

In summary, the results of this study showed that ruxolitinib salvage therapy demonstrated a superior FFS and ORR at 12 months. It is also encouraging to note that ruxolitinib use led to lower steroid use. The authors stated that “ruxolitinib as salvage therapy is promising for cGvHD refractory to steroids.” The REACH3 phase III multicenter, open-label randomized trial (n = 324 patients) is underway to evaluate ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for patients with SR-GvHD as second line of therapy.

References