All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
Bookmark this article
There are still no approved agents for preventing severe acute (a) graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), which is a major cause of non-relapse mortality (NRM). For patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, especially human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched unrelated donor transplant, severe aGvHD remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality.
In an article published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, Benjamin Watkins and colleagues describe the results of the phase II ABA2 trial (NCT01743131), which investigated adding abatacept, a T-cell costimulation blocker currently approved for rheumatoid arthritis, to a calcineurin inhibitor and methotrexate (CNI/MTX) for GvHD prophylaxis.1
Three cohorts were included in this study (see also Table 1). Patients undergoing transplant with stem cells from 8/8 HLA-matched unrelated donors (MUD study cohort, n = 148 enrolled) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive CNI/MTX plus placebo or abatacept. Patients transplanted with 7/8 HLA-mismatched donor stem cells (MMUD study cohort, n = 46 enrolled) received CNI/MTX plus abatacept, and these were compared with a prespecified control cohort from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR).
Patients were given:
Other endpoints included Grade III–IV aGvHD at Day +180; Grade II–IV aGvHD at Days +100 and +180; cGvHD at 1 year; NRM; relapse; relapse-free survival (RFS); overall survival (OS); cytomegalovirus reactivation and disease; Epstein-Barr virus reactivation and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease; hematologic recovery; and donor engraftment.
Table 1. Baseline patient and transplant characteristics1
Aba, abatacept; CIBMTR, Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research; CNI, calcineurin inhibitor; MAC, myeloablative conditioning; MMUD, mismatched unrelated donor; MUD, matched unrelated donor; RIC, reduced intensity conditioning. *Data from patients matched to the CIBMTR control group. |
|||||
MMUD |
MUD |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aba |
CIBMTR control |
Aba |
Placebo |
||
Median age, years (range) |
36.7 (6.6−76.5) |
45 (6.0−74.4) |
44.1 (6.9−71.9) |
41 (7.6−74.2) |
|
Age > 21 years, % |
57.9 |
69.3 |
78.1 |
75.4 |
|
White ethnicity, % |
68.4 |
82.7 |
86.3 |
87.0 |
|
Performance scores > 90%, % |
76.3 |
74.8 |
71.2 |
75.4 |
|
CIBMTR disease stage, % |
Advanced |
13.2 |
15.7 |
15.1 |
20.3 |
Intermediate |
15.8 |
14.2 |
19.2 |
23.2 |
|
Early |
68.4 |
69.3 |
64.4 |
55.0 |
|
Chemosensitive |
2.6 |
0.8 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
|
Conditioning intensity, % |
MAC |
73.7 |
68.5 |
75.3 |
71.0 |
RIC |
26.3 |
31.5 |
24.7 |
29.0 |
|
CNI, % |
Tacrolimus |
68.4 |
75.6 |
84.9 |
84.1 |
Cyclosporine |
31.6 |
24.4 |
15.1 |
15.9 |
|
Graft type, % |
Peripheral blood |
47.4 |
62.2 |
54.8 |
62.3 |
Bone marrow |
52.6 |
37.8 |
45.2 |
37.7 |
The most common malignancy experienced in this patient population was acute myeloid leukemia, followed by acute lymphoid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. As listed in Table 1, most patients received myeloablative conditioning. Controls were well matched for patient characteristics, and the majority of patients received tacrolimus as CNI – this was especially prominent in the 8/8 cohort.
Sex matching of donors and recipients was achieved in roughly 50% of patients across all groups, and graft source was split between peripheral blood and bone marrow across the whole population. However, in the historical CIBMTR control group, data on sex matching was missing in 28% of patients and data on the donor-recipient Epstein-Barr virus status was not available.
Table 2. Outcome of treatment1
Aba, abatacept; CI, confidence interval; CIBMTR, Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research control group; GvHD, graft-versus-host disease; MMUD, mismatched unrelated donor; mod, moderate; MUD, matched unrelated donor; NRM, non-relapse mortality; OS, overall survival; RFS, relapse free survival; SGFS, severe aGvHD-free survival. Significant values are highlighted in bold. |
||||||
Outcomes |
MMUD |
MUD |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aba |
CIBMTR |
p value |
Aba |
Placebo |
p value |
|
Acute GvHD at Day 100, % (80% CI) |
||||||
Grade II−IV |
39.5 (29.2−49.6) |
53.2 (47.3−58.7) |
0.06 |
43.1 (35.5−50.6) |
62.1 (53.9−69.3) |
0.006 |
Grade III-IV |
0 (0−0) |
30.2 (25.0−35.5) |
< 0.001 |
6.8 (3.7−11.3) |
14.8 (9.7−20.8) |
0.13 |
Acute GvHD at Day 180, % (80% CI) |
||||||
Grade II−IV |
39.5 (29.2−49.6) |
57.4 (51.3−62.9) |
0.03 |
44.8 (37−52.3) |
63.7 (55.5−70.8) |
0.006 |
Grade III−IV |
0 (0−0) |
32.1 (26.7−37.5) |
< 0.001 |
6.8 (3.7−11.3) |
14.8 (9.7−20.8) |
0.13 |
Chronic GvHD at 1 year, % (80% CI) |
||||||
Mild-severe |
62.2 (50.0−72.2) |
45.9 (39.6−51.9) |
0.74 |
51.9 (43.8−59.3) |
45.3 (36.8−53.3) |
0.55 |
Mod-severe |
N/A |
44.6 (36.8−52.2) |
36 (28.2−44) |
0.32 |
||
Other outcome measures, % (80% CI) |
||||||
SGFS at Day 180 |
100 (100−100) |
58.7 (52.7−64.2) |
< 0.001 |
93.2 (88.2−96.1) |
82 (75−87.2) |
0.05 |
Relapse |
7.9 (3.4−14.8) |
21.4 (16.7−26.5) |
0.21 |
21.5 (15.4−28.1) |
23.6 (17.2−30.5) |
0.66 |
RFS at 2 years |
75.9 (64.1−84.1) |
38.3 (32.4−44.1) |
0.001 |
65.7 (57.8−72.5) |
60.3 (52.2−67.5) |
0.28 |
NRM at 2 years |
16.3 (8.5−26.3) |
40.3 (34.4−46.1) |
0.01 |
12.8 (8.2−8.5) |
16.1 (10.9−22.3) |
0.45 |
OS at 2 years |
76.9 (64.4−85.2) |
45.3 (39.3−51.1) |
0.002 |
74.3 (66.9−80.4) |
64 (55.9−71) |
0.15 |
Safe and effective GvHD prophylaxis strategies for patients without HLA-matched sibling donors are desperately needed. In ABA2, abatacept was shown to reduce the incidence of aGvHD in patients receiving MMUD and MUD transplants and greatly improve survival outcomes for the MMUD cohort when compared to a matched historical control. The safety profile for this treatment was also shown to be acceptable. However, using a four-dose regimen of abatacept in this trial was not shown to have any impact on the incidence of chronic GvHD. In order to assess if a longer dosing schedule would improve the risk of cGvHD development, further trials are necessary.
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox