All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
The GvHD Hub is pleased to present a visual abstract summarizing key findings from a retrospective analysis comparing graft-versus-host disease cyclophosphamide-based prophylaxis posttransplant with sirolimus vs tacrolimus in adult patients undergoing haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.1 Most patients were diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia and a higher proportion of patients in the sirolimus cohort were aged >60 years.
The retrospective study was recently published by Elmariah et al.1 in Transplantation and Cellular Therapy.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox