All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.

  TRANSLATE

The gvhd Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the gvhd Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The gvhd and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Ruxolitinib for the treatment of BOS after allo-HSCT

By Devon Else

Share:

Jan 16, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in chronic GvHD.


Results of a multicenter study, evaluating ruxolitinib (n = 77) vs non-ruxolitinib therapies (n = 48) for the second-line treatment of patients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), were published in Annals of Hematology  by Tu et al. The primary endpoint was progression of BOS at Month 3 after initiation of second-line therapy.

Key data: By Month 3, 18.2% of patients treated with ruxolitinib had progressive disease (PD) vs 43.8% of those treated with non-ruxolitinib therapies (control; p = 0.001). The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 73.2% vs 60.2% in the ruxolitinib and control groups, respectively (p = 0.012). BOS-progression-free survival (BOS-PFS) was 69% vs 51.2%, respectively (p = 0.011). Overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 42.9% in the ruxolitinib group vs 54.2% in the control group.

Key learning: Preliminary evidence suggests ruxolitinib is an effective and well tolerated second-line treatment option for BOS. With the development of novel agents and strategies in recent years, the optimal management of pulmonary chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) has yet to be defined through large-scale real-world studies.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

What do you see as the main advantage of including ECP + Rux as an upfront combination?