The gvhd Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the gvhd Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The gvhd and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View gvhd content recommended for you
Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) refractory to steroid therapy is associated with poor prognosis. Currently, there is no safe and effective treatment approved for children under the age of 12 years.1 The hallmark of aGvHD is systemic inflammation caused by alloreactive donor T cells attacking the patient’s tissues leading to tissue injury. The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) disparity between the hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donor and the recipient is the key trigger of the immune activation.2 In vitro studies and results from animal models demonstrated immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory function of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs).3,4 Initial clinical trials showed acceptable safety and promising clinical responses, including reduction of inflammatory biomarkers.5-7
Previously, a multicentre expanded-access protocol study (NCT00759018) assessed remestemcel-L, an ex-vivo cultured adult human MSCs infusion, in 241 pediatric patients with steroid-refractory (SR) aGvHD. They demonstrated a 65% overall response (OR) at Day 28 and increased survival at Day 100 in responders compared with non-responders (82% versus 39%, p < 0.001).7 A phase III study (NCT02336230) designed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of remestemcel-L in pediatric patients with high-risk SR-aGvHD was recently reported by Joanne Kurtzberg, Duke University, Durham, US, and colleagues.8 The article below summarises key findings from the study.
Table 1. Selected baseline patient characteristics
aGvHD, acute graft versus host disease; min, minimum; max, maximum; PBSC, peripheral blood stem cells; SR-aGVHD steroid refractory aGvHD; HLA, human leukocyte antigen |
|
Characteristics |
Remestemcel-L (n= 55) |
Median age (min, max) |
7.0 (0, 17) |
Male, % |
63.6 |
HLA donor HLA frequency, % Matched/related Mismatched/related Unrelated |
10.9 12.7 76.4 |
Type of transplant, % Bone marrow PBSC Cord blood |
54.5 25.5 20.0 |
aGvHD at baseline, % Grade B Grade C Grade D |
10.9 41.8 47.3 |
Organ involvement, % Single organ Multiple organ |
63.6 36.4 |
aGvHD risk Standard-risk High-risk |
27.3 72.7 |
aGVHD onset to first infusion, days Median (min, max) |
12.0 (4, 142) |
SR-aGVHD to first infusion, days Median (min, max) |
3.5 (1, 10) |
Efficacy
Table 2. Clinical response endpoints
CR, complete response; MR, mixed response; NR, no response; PD progressive disease; OR, overall response, PR, partial response; VGPR, very good partial response |
|
Endpoint |
Remestemcel-L (n = 54), % |
Day 28 response |
|
Responder (OR) CR PR VGPR Non-responder MR NR PD |
70.4 29.6 40.7 9.3 31.5 9.3 14.8 7.4 |
Day 56 response |
|
Responder (OR) CR PR VGPR Non-responder Missing |
59.3 31.5 27.8 11.1 22.2 20.4 |
Day 100 response |
|
Responder (OR) CR PR VGPR Non-responder Missing |
70.4 44.4 25.9 7.4 11.1 20.4 |
Safety
Table 3. Summary of safety outcomes
TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse events |
||
TEAE |
MSB-GvHD001 % (n = 54) |
MSB-GvHD002 % (n = 32) |
Any TEAE Possibly treatment-related Any infusion reaction Leading to discontinuation |
100 16.7 5.6 14.8 |
84.4 0 0 0 |
Any serious TEAE Possibly treatment-related Leading to discontinuation Deaths |
64.8 9.3 11.1 25.9 |
46.9 0 0 9.4 |
TEAE by system organ class Infections and infestations Gastrointestinal disorders General disorders Metabolism and nutrition disorders Laboratory investigations Respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders Immune system disorders |
83.3 57.4 50.0 48.1 50.0 48.1 40.7 |
50.0 28.1 34.4 31.3 28.1 21.9 15.6 |
Serious TEAE by system organ class Infections and infestations Respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders General disorders Gastrointestinal disorders Immune system disorders |
31.5 22.2 14.8 13.0 11.1 |
25.0 0 3.1 3.1 0 |
Study demonstrated remestemcel-L as a relatively safe and effective treatment option for pediatric patients with SR-aGVHD that induced a durable overall response rate of 70.4% with rates for complete responses improving from day 28 up to day 100. Moreover, a response at Day 28 indicated improved survival at Day 180.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content