All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit Know GvHD.

  TRANSLATE

The GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Proposed diagnostic scoring system for CNS-cGvHD

By Nathan Fisher

Share:

May 7, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in chronic graft-versus-host disease.


A proposed diagnostic scoring system for central nervous system (CNS) manifestations of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD; CNS-cGvHD) was published in Transplantation and Cellular Therapy by Denk et al. The 10-point scoring system was retrospectively applied to a single-center cohort of 770 patients who survived ≥3 months after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Using the scoring system, CNS-cGvHD was categorized as unlikely, possible, or probable. 

Key data: The three CNS-cGvHD phenotypes proposed were vasculitis-like, meningoencephalitis, and demyelinating. Among 770 patients screened, 19 presented with possible (n = 6) or probable (n = 13) CNS-cGvHD. For each phenotype, a 10-point scoring system integrated clinical features, neuroimaging, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings, extraneurologic cGvHD manifestations, onset after immunosuppression taper ≥3 months after allo-HSCT or donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) / stem cell backup, histology, and response to immunosuppressive therapy (IST). Of 19 suspected CNS-cGvHD cases, 12 were classified as meningoencephalitis, four as vasculitis-like, one as demyelinating, and two as mixed-phenotype. Most patients scored 4–6 points; no patients had a score ≥7 points, largely attributed to the lack of CNS biopsies. 

Key learning: The proposed diagnostic scoring system provides a framework for consistent diagnosis and classification of atypical presentations of cGvHD in the CNS. Prospective validation in larger, multicenter cohorts is required to support its clinical utility.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

What do you consider to be the main potential advantage of mesenchymal stromal cells in the treatment of acute GvHD?