All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Ran Reshef from Abramson Cancer Center and the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA, and colleagues conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of maraviroc in combination with conventional graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis in patients with hematological malignancies who received reduced-intensity conditioning and underwent unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The findings were published in the Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation.
Primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of grade 2–4 acute GvHD by day 180. Conditioning regimen contained fludarabine (i.v. 120 mg/m2) and busulfan (i.v. 6.4 mg/kg) (Flu/Bu), followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilized peripheral blood stem cell graft from an unrelated donor on day 0. Patients (n = 37; median age = 64 years [range, 49–72]) received GvHD prophylaxis regimen including tacrolimus (0.06 mg/kg/d in 2 divided doses starting on day –3) and methotrexate (i.v. 15 mg/m2 on day 1 and 10 mg/m2 on days 3, 6 and 11). Patients received oral maraviroc twice daily from day –3 until day 90.
3-month course vs 1-month course of maraviroc
Impact of day 0 maraviroc concentration on outcomes
In conclusion, maraviroc, administered for three months, efficiently prevents acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Survival and GvHD-free/relapse-free survival were superior in patients who received maraviroc for three months compared with patients who received one month of maraviroc. Higher day 0 maraviroc concentrations showed significant correlation with lower rates of acute GvHD.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox