All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Second line or further lines of therapy represent an unmet need in treating patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) due to disease progression or the lack of response. Axatilimab is a novel, humanized, immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) antibody inhibiting colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R) agent, which is currently under development for the treatment of patients with refractory cGvHD following ≥2 lines of systemic therapy. CSF-1/CSF-1R pathway has been shown to associated with the growth and infiltration of donor-derived macrophages leading to cGvHD.
During the 62nd American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, Mukta Arora presented the preliminary phase I results1, and this article summarizes the key points.
The study population included patients ≥6 years of age, with active cGvHD following ≥ 2 lines of prior therapies, and who had Karnofsky performance score ≥60%. Corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors were allowed.
Endpoints were safety, tolerability, overall response rate (ORR), and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Dose escalation design is depicted in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Study design (adapted from Arora et al., 2020)1
Q2W, every 2 weeks; Q4W, every 4 weeks.Total number of patients was 15 with a median age of 60 years (range, 29–73 years). Almost half (47%) of patients underwent myeloablative transplant. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) were used as graft source in 93% of patients. The median time from cGvHD to Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1) was 42 months (range, 9.6–187.2 months). Median number of organs involved was 4 (range, 1–9), and median number of prior treatments was 4 (range, 2–9). Prior therapies included ibrutinib, ruxolitinib, and KD025.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) that were considered related to axatilimab, occurred in all patients among different dose ranges. Grade 3–4 events occurring in ≥ 2 patients comprised elevated creatine kinase levels (n = 3), aspartate aminotransferase increase (n = 2), and pneumonia (n = 2). Infectious events were observed in six patients including pneumonia, conjunctivitis, norovirus gastroenteritis, influenza, lung infection, Pseudomonas infection in the foot, and upper respiratory infection. Reactivation of cytomegalovirus was not observed. The results of safety analysis are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Safety outcomes2
AE, adverse event; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CPK, creatine phosphokinase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; Q2W, every 2 weeks, Q4W, every 4 weeks; TEAE, treatment-emergent AE. *0.15 mg/kg Q2W. †0.5 mg/kg Q2W. ‡All grades regardless of causality. |
||||
Outcome, n (%) |
< 1 mg/kg Q2W n = 2 |
1 mg/kg Q2W n = 3 |
3 mg/kg Q2W n = 6 |
3 mg/kg Q4W n = 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Grade 3–4 TEAE |
2 (100) |
2 (67) |
4 (67) |
2 (50) |
Related Grade 3–4 TEAE |
1 (50)* |
1 (33) |
3 (50) |
2 (50) |
Treatment discontinuation Progression AE Physician decision Death Other |
2 (100) 1 (100)* 0 1 (100)† 0 0 |
2 (67) 1 (33) 0 0 1 (33) 0 |
3 (50) 0 1 (17) 1 (17) 0 1 (17) |
1 (25) 0 0 1 (25) 0 0 |
TEAEs occurring ≥ 5 patients‡ Elevated AST Elevated CPK Elevated LDH Elevated amylase Fatigue Elevated lipase Elevated ALT Elevated creatinine Nausea Pyrexia |
1 (50)* 0 1 (50)† 1 (50)* 1 (50)† 0 1 (50)* 0 2 (100) 0 |
1 (33) 1 (33) 2 (67) 1 (33) 0 1 (33) 0 1 (33) 0 1 (33) |
4 (67) 5 (83) 4 (67) 4 (67) 3 (50) 3 (50) 3 (50) 2 (33) 3 (50) 4 (67) |
3 (75) 3 (75) 2 (50) 0 2 (50) 2 (50) 1 (25) 2 (50) 0 0 |
Responses were achieved at all dose levels with deep and durable responses observed in different organ systems:
The median time to response was 1.9 months (range 1–11 months), and ORR was 57%. Lee symptom scores were also improved in most patients.
This patient population represents a heavily pretreated, recurrent/refractory active cGvHD cohort. In this study, axatilimab has shown good tolerability with low infection rates, and clinical activity was shown with responses in different organ systems, and following treatment with ibrutinib, ruxolitinib, and KD025; however, the limitation of small sample size was acknowledged. A phase II study (AGAVE-201) is planned to further investigate the efficacy and safety of axatilimab with three different doses.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox