All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
The GvHD Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Monthly theme | GvHD prophylaxis
Bookmark this article
Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is a common complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT). GvHD can be acute (aGvHD) or chronic (cGvHD); the latter is the most common long-term complication post-transplant and is the leading cause of non-relapse mortality (NRM) in transplant survivors who are otherwise cured of their disease.1 The specific risk for GvHD depends upon multiple factors including; stem cell source, patient age, the choice of conditioning regimen and the GvHD prophylaxis used.2 There are several options for GvHD prophylaxis, with many more under investigation.
This month, the GvHD Hub are focusing on the topic of GvHD prophylaxis. This article provides an insight into the current standard of care (SOC) regimens for GvHD prophylaxis, therapies under investigation, and expert interviews on the topic.
EBMT-ELN working group recommendations for GvHD prophylaxis3,4
The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines recommend patients receiving allo-HSCT, with standard-risk disease, from a matched-related donor (MRD) or matched-unrelated donor (MUD), with bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) as the stem cell source, are treated with:3,4
- A calcineurin inhibitor, commonly tacrolimus or cyclosporine A (CsA)
- An antimetabolite such as methotrexate (MTX) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for patients requiring rapid engraftment
- In MUD, antithymocyte globulin (ATG) is recommended
To read more about the EBMT-ELN guidelines from the 1st EBMT GvHD Summit, click here.
Clinical trials and analyses for GvHD prophylaxis
In addition to current SOC regimens, there are many ongoing clinical trials and investigations that are aiming to define the optimal prophylaxis treatment for each transplant situation and test new novel agents and combinations. The GvHD Hub has summarized some of these in Tables 1–3, with links to the original coverage from the GvHD Hub.
Table 1. Studies investigating post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PtCy) alone, or in combination, as GvHD prophylaxis
|
Therapy and link to article |
Donor |
Trial details |
Summary |
|
MUD |
Patients with sickle cell disease |
Case series of four patients. Promising results using PtCy as GvHD prophylaxis with good one-year survival outcomes and reasonable toxicity |
|
|
SD |
Phase II study using PBSC in patients with severe aplastic anemia |
Encouraging results for PtCy as a single agent in SD transplants using PBSC. There were lower rates of aGvHD and cGvHD in the PtCy group compared to historical cohorts using MTX |
|
|
MUD and mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) |
- |
PtCy + ATG in patients undergoing MUD allo-HSCT with PBSCs resulted in low rates of grade III–IV aGvHD and cGvHD with acceptable safety and relapse rates |
|
|
Haplo-identical |
Phase II study using unrelated cord blood + PBSC as stem cell source |
LD ATG + LD PtCy is a promising prophylaxis regimen in the haplo-setting. |
|
|
MUD, MRD, haploidentical and MMUD |
Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) and given PBSC |
Following RIC, ATG + PtCy led to low rates of aGvHD and cGvHD |
|
|
Haplo-identical |
RIC with low-dose bulsulfan, fludarabine, total body irradiation + |
Encouraging results for patients receiving RIC + ATG + PtCy + cyclosporine after haploidentical transplant, with lower rates of grade II–IV GvHD. However, there were higher rates of viral reactivation |
|
|
MRD |
|
Single-agent PtCy was superior to MMF or MTX in relation to grade II–IV and III–IV aGvHD with improved overalls survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and GvHD/relapse-free survival (GRFS) |
During the EBMT annual meeting, Frankfurt, DE, 2019, the GvHD Hub spoke to Arnon Nagler, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, IL, regarding whether PtCy or ATG should be used as prophylaxis in haploidentical SCT. Watch the video below:
Should we use PTCy or ATG as GvHD prophylaxis in haploidentical stem cell transplantation?
Table 2. Studies investigating calcineurin inhibitor combinations for GvHD prophylaxis
|
Therapy and link to article |
Donor |
Trial details |
Summary |
|
MRD |
Prospective phase II study |
The use of tacrolimus + ATG did not meet the primary endpoint (reduction of grade II–IV aGvHD below the pre-determined threshold). 12/20 patients developed aGvHD and the study was terminated after the first stage |
|
|
Not reported (NR)
|
Pediatric, adolescent and young adults |
MMF + tacrolimus prophylaxis was safe and efficient in this population |
|
|
MUD and MRD |
GvHD prophylaxis after RIC with PBSC as stem cell source |
All four regimens yielded equal benefits in relation to outcome. In MUD, RIC, allo-HSCT, MMF-cyclosporine was inferior compared to MTX-based regimens for aGvHD prophylaxis, but no difference in cGvHD and OS. |
|
|
NR |
Multicenter, randomized phase III trial |
CMMS reduced the incidence of aGvHD and improved OS and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to standard treatment alone. Results indicate the CMMS combination should be used for patients receiving MMUD transplant who are treated with non-myeloablative conditioning |
Table 3. Studies investigating novel agents and other regimens as GvHD prophylaxis
|
Therapy and link to article |
Donor |
Trial details |
Summary |
|
MUD |
Interim phase II results |
Azacitidine can be used safely as GvHD prophylaxis after day +7 after MUD |
|
|
NR |
Meta-analysis on MSCs to prevent cGvHD |
Using MSCs as prophylaxis was safe and effective in preventing cGvHD |
|
|
NR |
Phase II study |
Addition of tocilizumab to SOC reduced rates of aGVHD, though OS and transplant-related mortality (TRM) rates were unaffected |
|
|
NR |
|
Preclinical and clinical data support the use of iNKT cells in aGvHD prophylaxis |
|
|
MRD or MUD |
Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled phase II study, ABA2, |
Short course abatacept is safe and effective in preventing aGvHD without compromising relapse, meaning matched donor transplant may be able to become more widely available |
|
|
MUD |
Phase Ib study |
Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with the expected risks with no dose-limiting toxicities. Promising results with low cumulative incidences of grade II–IV aGvHD and severe lower gastrointestinal aGvHD. Watch the GvHD Hub interview with Yi-Bin Chen below |
|
|
Maraviroc + tacrolimus + MTX |
MUD |
Phase II study in patients receiving RIC |
Maraviroc administered for three months prevents aGvHD and cGvHD, providing superior GRFS compared to patients receiving maraviroc for one month |
|
MUD and MRD |
Japanese, nationwide, retrospective analysis in pediatric patients |
MMF was found to be safe and effective in pediatric patients |
The GvHD Hub were also pleased to speak to Yi-Bin Chen at the American Society of Hematology (ASH) meeting, 2018, about vedolizumab + SOC for GvHD prophylaxis.
Vedolizumab plus standard of care for GvHD prophylaxis
Over the coming weeks, the GvHD Hub will be publishing new content surrounding GvHD prophylaxis, featuring the latest data and educational content – stay tuned!
- Lee S.J. Classification systems for chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2017 Jan 05. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-07-686642
- Jacobsohn D.A. and Vogelsang G.B. Acute graft versus host disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007 Sep 04. DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-2-35
- Ruutu T. et al. Prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD: EBMT-ELN working group recommendations for a standardized practice. Bone Marrow Trans. 2014 Jul 29. DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2013.107
- Penack O. Prophylaxis and treatment of GvHD: EBMT-ELN working group recommendations for standardized practice. 1st EBMT GVHD Summit. Warsaw, PL. 2019 May 16–18. Oral presentation
Your opinion matters
8 votes - 27 days left ...
Related articles
Newsletter
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox