All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
The number of neutrophils present in graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) lesions strongly correlates with the severity of intestinal GvHD,1 but it is still unclear whether a difference in the speed of neutrophil recovery, after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), has some influence on posttransplant complications and prognosis.
In a retrospective study, recently published in Transplant International, Takashi Nagayama and colleagues evaluated the influence of the speed of neutrophil recovery on the incidence of acute GvHD (aGvHD), in adult patients who underwent a first unrelated bone marrow transplantation.2
We hereby present a summary of their findings.
Patients included in the study were ˃ 17 years old and underwent a first unrelated bone marrow transplantation, with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support, between January 2009 and December 2018.
Conditioning regimens:
GvHD prophylaxis:
G-CSF was started on 7 days after allo-HCT in all patients, except for two patients who started G-CSFs on Day 1, for accelerating bone marrow recovery.
Defining the cutoff for neutrophil recovery slope:
120 Patients were evaluated in this analysis and baseline characteristics are reported in Table 1.
Table 1. Patient characteristics2
AA, aplastic anemia; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; ATG, antithymocyte globulin; CML, chronic myeloid leukemia; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; MAC, myeloablative conditioning; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; ML, malignant lymphoma; MTX, methotrexate; RIC, reduced-intensity conditioning; TBI, total body irradiation. *Standard-risk diseases included acute leukemia in first or second complete remission, CML in the first or second chronic phase, lymphoma in complete remission, MDS, AA, myelofibrosis, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and multiple myeloma. Other diseases were classified as high-risk. Values indicated in bold are statistically significant. |
||||
Characteristic |
Total N = 120 |
Low N slope n = 59 |
High N slope n = 61 |
p value |
Age, years, median (range) |
50 (18–69) |
45 (19–68) |
52 (18–69) |
0.03 |
Disease, n (%) |
|
|
|
|
AML |
48 (40) |
24 (40.7) |
24 (39.3) |
0.69 |
ALL |
27 (22.5) |
16 (27.1) |
11 (18) |
|
MDS |
20 (16.7) |
9 (15.3) |
11 (18) |
|
CML |
4 (3.3) |
2 (3.4) |
2 (3.3) |
|
ML |
9 (7.5) |
4 (6.8) |
5 (8.2) |
|
AA |
3 (2.5) |
0 (0) |
3 (4.9) |
|
Other |
9 (7.5) |
4 (6.8) |
5 (8.2) |
|
Disease risk*, n (%) |
|
|
|
|
High |
18 (15) |
8 (13.6) |
10 (16.4) |
0.80 |
Standard |
102 (85) |
51 (86.4) |
51 (83.6) |
|
HLA matching, n (%) |
|
|
|
|
Match |
84 (70) |
45 (76.3) |
39 (63.9) |
0.17 |
Mismatch |
36 (30) |
14 (23.7) |
22 (36.1) |
|
Donor age, n (%) |
|
|
|
|
< 40 years |
65 (54.2) |
33 (55.9) |
32 (52.5) |
0.72 |
≥ 40 years |
55 (45.8) |
26 (44.1) |
29 (47.5) |
|
Day 11 MTX, n (%) |
|
|
|
|
Yes |
65 (54.2) |
40 (67.8) |
25 (41) |
0.004 |
No |
55 (45.8) |
19 (32.2) |
36 (59) |
|
ATG, n (%) |
|
|
|
|
Yes |
16 (13.3) |
7 (11.9) |
9 (14.8) |
0.79 |
No |
104 (86.7) |
52 (88.1) |
52 (85.2) |
|
Conditioning, n (%) |
|
|
|
|
MAC |
100 (83.3) |
54 (91.5) |
46 (75.4) |
0.03 |
RIC |
20 (16.7) |
5 (8.5) |
15 (24.6) |
|
TBI regimen, n (%) |
|
|
|
|
Yes |
78 (65) |
35 (59.3) |
43 (70.5) |
0.25 |
No |
42 (35) |
24 (40.7) |
18 (29.5) |
|
Infuse CD34+ cells, n (%) |
|
|
|
|
< 1.5 × 106/kg |
50 (44.6) |
30 (55.6) |
20 (34.5) |
0.04 |
≥ 1.5 × 106/kg |
62 (55.4) |
24 (44.4) |
38 (65.5) |
|
Transplantation year, n (%) |
|
|
|
|
2009–2013 |
45 (37.5) |
16 (27.1) |
29 (47.5) |
0.03 |
2014–2018 |
75 (62.5) |
43 (72.9) |
32 (52.5) |
|
The cumulative incidence of Grade II (n = 28) aGvHD was significantly higher in the high N slope group compared with the low N slope group (34.4% vs 11.9%; p = 0.002). Similarly, the incidence for Grade II–IV (n = 37) aGvHD was significantly higher in the high N slope group (44% vs 17%; p < 0.001). In contrast, no significant difference was observed in the cumulative incidence of Grade III–IV (n = 9) and Grade I (n = 36) aGvHD between the two groups.
The impact of neutrophil recovery on aGvHD target organs was analysed showing a significantly higher cumulative incidence of aGvHD for gut and liver in the high N slope group. The cumulative incidence of aGvHD in the high N slope group vs the low N slope group was:
Using univariate and multivariate analysis, the highest risk of developing Grade II–IV aGvHD was found in the high N slope group. Other significant risk factors were age > 40 years, receiving TBI, and having had allo-HCT between 2009 and 2013. Male sex was significant only in the univariate analysis, while major HLA mismatch was identified as a Grade II–IV aGvHD significant risk factor only in the multivariate analysis. Risk factors are reported in Table 2.
Table 2. Risk factors for Grade II–IV aGvHD in univariate and multivariate analyses2
aGvHD, acute graft-versus-host disease; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; N, neutrophil; TBI, total body irradiation. Values indicated in bold are statistically significant. |
|||||
|
n |
Cumulative incidence of Grade II–IV aGvHD at day +100, % (95% CI) |
Univariate p |
HR (95% CI) |
Multivariate p |
Donor age |
|
|
|
|
|
< 40 |
65 |
18.5 (10.1–28.8) |
0.002 |
1 |
Reference |
≥ 40 |
55 |
45.5 (31.9–58.1) |
|
3.63 (1.57–8.40) |
0.003 |
Sex |
|
|
|
|
|
Male |
77 |
23.4 (14.6–33.3) |
0.02 |
1 |
Reference |
Female |
43 |
44.2 (28.9–58.4) |
|
0.56 (0.27–1.18) |
0.13 |
ABO mismatch |
|
|
|
|
|
Major mismatch |
27 |
44.4 (25.1–62.2) |
0.06 |
3.05 (1.47–6.31) |
0.003 |
Other |
93 |
26.9 (18.3–36.2) |
|
1 |
Reference |
TBI |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
78 |
38.5 (27.7–49.1) |
0.01 |
2.83 (1.20–6.67) |
0.02 |
No |
42 |
16.7 (7.2–29.4) |
|
1 |
Reference |
N slope |
|
|
|
|
|
< 200 |
59 |
16.9 (8.7–27.6) |
< 0.001 |
1 |
Reference |
≥ 200 |
61 |
44.3 (31.5–56.3) |
|
3.73 (1.88–7.42) |
< 0.001 |
Transplantation year |
|
|
|
|
|
2009–2013 |
45 |
46.7 (31.5–60.5) |
0.003 |
3.28 (1.40–7.68) |
0.006 |
2014–2018 |
75 |
21.3 (12.9–31.2) |
|
1 |
Reference |
After a median follow-up of 29 months (range, 1─116), 40 patients died, 16 of them from non-relapse complications. The N slope had no impact on the cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality (p = 0.32), relapse (p = 0.76), and overall survival (p = 0.65).
In this retrospective study, the authors found an association between a rapid rate of neutrophil recovery following allo-HCT and the increased risk of developing Grade II–IV aGvHD.
However, besides being retrospective, this study presents other limitations such as:
Additional studies are required to demonstrate a clear association between neutrophil recovery and aGvHD.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox