All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Despite prophylactic measures, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remains a serious complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Janus kinase (JAK) signaling plays a key role in the pathogenesis of GvHD, and JAK inhibition is being actively pursued as a therapeutic option for steroid-refractory patients.
Itacitinib is a JAK1 inhibitor that has been investigated in combination with corticosteroids for the treatment of GvHD, although the combined regimen did not improve overall response rates in the phase III GRAVITAS-301 trial. The phase I GRAVITAS-119 study (NCT03320642) evaluated itacitinib in combination with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based regimens for the prophylaxis of GvHD. Here, we are pleased to summarize the results presented by Hannah Choe and colleagues during the 62nd American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition.1
GRAVITAS-119 is a single-arm, open-label, phase I study of itacitinib in combination with CNI-based regimens for prophylaxis of GvHD in adult patients undergoing allogeneic HCT for a hematologic malignancy. Enrolled patients were candidates for reduced-intensity conditioning and peripheral blood stem cell transplant. Other eligibility criteria included a Karnofsky score of ≥70% or ECOG score 0–2.
The primary endpoint was hematologic recovery at Day 28, defined by absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥500/mm3 and platelet count ≥20,000/mm3.
Secondary endpoints were GvHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS), transplant-related mortality, overall survival (OS), time to engraftment, incidence of GvHD, and safety.
The study design is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Overview of GRAVITAS-119 study design1
ATG, anti-thymocyte globulin; CsA, cyclosporine A; ITA, itacitinib; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MTX, methotrexate; OS, overall survival, Tac, tacrolimus.
Selected characteristics for patients receiving itacitinib plus CNI-based regimen, with or without ATG, are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Selected patient and transplant characteristics1
ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; ATG, anti-thymocyte globulin; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; MDS, myelodysplastic syndromes. |
||
|
Without ATG |
With ATG |
---|---|---|
Patient characteristic |
||
Median age, years (range) |
65 (25–76) |
64 (42–72) |
ECOG grade, % |
|
|
Underlying malignancy, % |
|
|
Disease risk index, % |
|
|
Transplant characteristic |
||
HLA donor type, % |
|
|
Table 2. Hematologic recovery1
ANC, absolute neutrophil count; CsA, cyclosporine A; ITA, itacitinib; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MTX, methotrexate; Tac, tacrolimus. |
|||
|
ITA + Tac/MTX |
ITA + CsA/MMF |
Total |
---|---|---|---|
ANC recovery* |
|
|
|
Evaluable‡, n |
38 |
23 |
61 |
Platelet recovery† |
|
|
|
Evaluable‡, n |
23 |
16 |
39 |
Secondary graft failure occurred in two patients, both of whom received a second transplant. One graft failure occurred on treatment, at Day 65, the other at Day 182 during follow-up, approximately 4 months after the last itacitinib dose.
Outcomes for secondary endpoints are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3. Secondary endpoints1
ATG, anti-thymocyte globulin; GRFS, GvHD-free and relapse-free survival; GvHD, graft-versus-host disease; OS, overall survival. |
||
Endpoint, % |
Without ATG |
With ATG |
---|---|---|
Acute GvHD, cumulative incidence at Day 180 |
|
|
Chronic GvHD, cumulative incidence at 1 year |
|
|
Relapse or progression, cumulative incidence at 1 year |
28.2 |
4.3 |
Estimated GRFS at 1 year |
23.1 |
60.9 |
Estimated OS at 1 year |
74.3 |
82.6 |
The addition of itacitinib to CNI-based regimens was well tolerated, with 64 out of 65 patients achieving the primary endpoint of hematologic recovery within 28 days. While the incidence of acute GvHD was low and 1-year GRFS rates were encouraging, treatment appeared to have little impact on the frequency of chronic GvHD, except for patients receiving ATG.
Larger and more homogeneous study cohorts are required to further evaluate the efficacy of this combination for GvHD prophylaxis. Evaluation of an itacitinib + post-transplant cyclophosphamide combination is currently underway in the GRAVITAS-119 trial.
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox