All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Besides disease relapse, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is one of the main causes of death following stem cell transplantation (SCT). Single-agent frontline corticosteroid therapy is the recommended first-line treatment of GvHD. Nevertheless, only about half of the patients respond, and a significant subset develops glucocorticoid-refractory GvHD. Furthermore, extended corticosteroid therapy comes with considerable side effects, which makes new effective and more tolerable GvHD treatments crucial.1
Therefore, Cheng Hou et al.1 investigated in a phase I/II trial (NCT04397367) the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in combination with low-dose methylprednisolone as first-line treatment for acute GvHD (aGvHD) following haplo-SCT. The results of this study were recently published in Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and are summarized below.
From the 100 patients who underwent haplo-SCT between January–December 2019, 62 developed Grade 1–4 aGvHD. Of those, 32 had Grade 2–3 aGvHD and an intermediate- or high-risk MAGIC biomarker score and received frontline methylprednisolone in combination with ruxolitinib. These 32 patients had a median age of 35.7 years (range, 14.0–63.0) and a diagnosis of aGvHD at a median of 23.0 days after haplo-SCT. Organ involvement included the gastrointestinal tract (GIT; n = 13), skin (n = 9), liver (n = 1), skin and GIT (n = 8) or skin, GIT and liver (n = 1).
The efficacy outcomes of frontline methylprednisolone and ruxolitinib for the treatment of 2–3 aGvHD are shown below in Table 1. In brief, the overall response rate (ORR) was 96.8% at Day 56 of treatment, with one patient dying before response assessment due to disease relapse. GvHD recurrence occurred in 31.2% of patients who achieved a CR or partial response (PR) with the main reasons being:
Table 1. Outcomes following frontline methylprednisolone plus rituximab1
aGvHD, acute graft-versus-host disease; cGvHD, chronic GvHD; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; DFS, disease-free survival; FFS, failure-free survival; GRFS, GvHD-free, relapse-free survival; NRM, non-relapse mortality; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival |
|||
Outcome |
Methylprednisolone + ruxolitinib (n = 32) |
Historical control group (n = 31) |
p value |
ORR (at Day 56), % |
96.8 |
58.1 |
— |
CR rate at Day 28, % |
100 |
67.7 |
< 0.001 |
Median time to CR, days (range) |
7.9 (1–56) |
— |
— |
aGvHD recurrence after prior response, % |
3
|
30.8 |
< 0.001 |
2-year cumulative cGvHD incidence rate, % |
13.8
|
— |
— |
1-year NRM, % |
8.7
|
11.7
|
0.595 |
1-year OS, % |
73.4
|
71.3
|
0.996 |
1-year GRFS, % (95% CI) |
63.7 (43.6–93.0) |
42.9 (24.9–74.2) |
0.064 |
1-year FFS, % (95% CI) |
63.7 (43.6–93.0) |
20.6 (9.5–44.7) |
< 0.001 |
No deaths due to NRM were observed in patients with late aGvHD. Additional secondary systemic immunosuppression was needed in five patients either due to recurrent aGvHD (n = 2) or due to mild cGvHD (n = 3). Leukemia-free survival was achieved by 26 patients with 10 of them having discontinued all immunosuppressive GvHD prophylactic treatment within a year after haplo-SCT. Twelve patients were maintained on ruxolitinib for a median of 176 days (range, 43–383) and six died within 1 year.
Ruxolitinib treatment (median initial dose of 5 mg) was continued for a median of 123 days (range, 6–422). The main reasons for ruxolitinib discontinuation were:
No hepatotoxicity, neutropenia or life-threatening hemorrhages were observed but cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation occurred in 78.1% and 87.5% of cases, respectively, without EBV associated mortality.
As far as methylprednisolone was concerned, the mean dose was 17.6 ± 8.2 mg/kg with a mean time to discontinuation of 42.6 ± 16.8 days. Methylprednisolone was stopped within 1 year following haplo-SCT in all patients.
With regards to relapse and survival outcomes, these are shown in Table 1. Briefly, 15.6% of patients relapsed following haplo-SCT at a median on 139 days (range, 31–307). Two patients died due to CMV encephalitis or viral infection.
When assessing the outcomes (Table 1), GvHD recurrence was significantly higher in the historical control group than in the methylprednisolone + ruxolitinib group, while the CR/PR rate at Day 28 was significantly lower. Moreover, the 1-year FFS was significantly lower in the control group compared with the methylprednisolone + ruxolitinib group.
The preliminary results from this prospective trial indicate that frontline therapy with methylprednisolone plus rituximab might be beneficial for patients with intermediate- or high-risk Grade 2–3 aGvHD. The observed ORR was 96.8% with patients achieving CR irrespective of aGvHD severity or organ involvement. Limitations of this trial include its small sample size, non-prospective control group comparisons, and the low mean age of the enrolled patients that could explain the high efficacy outcomes. Thus, further large-scale, prospective clinical trials are needed to validate the efficacy and safety of daily frontline methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg) plus rituximab (5 mg) in this patient subset.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox