All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), an immunomodulatory therapy, removes peripheral blood, then separates the buffy coat, and finally irradiates the cells before re-infusion. This technic is commonly used either in combination with infliximab or monotherapy as a second-line treatment for patients with acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) who are dependent or refractory to steroids. A retrospective study on whether the addition of ECP could increase response rates and survival was published ahead of print in Bone Marrow Transplantation by Marietta Nygaard from Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, and colleagues. The study group were assessing three different approaches on how to use of ECP efficiently in patients with aGvHD.
Data was collected from 38 patients treated with ECP between January 2014 and August 2017 at the Department of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Patients received 2 mg/kg prednisolone or methylprednisolone as first-line aGvHD therapy. If a patient was steroid-refractory (progression after 3 days or no improvement of aGvHD after 7 days), or steroid-dependent (inability to taper steroids without recurrence of aGvHD symptoms), they were treated with ECP.
In ECP-salvage and ECP-early groups, infliximab was administered weekly or biweekly continuously until response was achieved.
In conclusion, the authors stated that ECP is an efficient treatment option for aGvHD, especially if it is given early in combination with infliximab. The key limitations of this study include its retrospective nature, the absence of a control group, and the small sample size. A prospective, controlled, and randomized study is warranted to confirm these findings.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox