All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
An oral abstract was presented at the 44th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), Lisbon, Portugal, on Wednesday 21 March 2018, from Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Division of Hematology, Saitama, Japan.
Graft-versus-host disease-free survival (GRFS) has been a key measure to estimate transplant outcomes, hence it characterizes disease-free survival as well as survival without major morbidity related to GvHD. GRFS definites GvHD as a permanent therapy failure event, despite of the fact that GvHD might response to treatment. As a result, GRFS may overestimates the effect of GvHD on the outcome of allo-HCT.
This study aimed to identify a new endpoint that accurately recognizes the long-term outcomes of allo-HCT including life expectancy, disease remission, and quality of life (QOL).
This study showed that cGRFS and rGRFS more accurately reflect long-term transplant outcomes than standard GRFS. “Particularly, rGRFS can be easily calculated and analyzed with widely-used statistical approaches including proportional hazard modeling. Therefore, we propose rGRFS as a more effective and simple endpoint for assessing the long-term transplant success.”
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox