All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Studies in the haploidentical transplantation setting have demonstrated that post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) works by eliminating alloreactive T cells, while preserving the memory and regulatory T cells, resulting in less GvHD, better immune tolerance and less graft rejection.
While (PTCy) is widely and successfully used for the prevention of GvHD after haploidentical stem cell transplants (HSCT),1 only a few studies have looked at the use of PTCy for patients undergoing HLA-matched related (MRD) and matched unrelated (MUD) transplants.
Riad El Fakih, from the Department of Adult Hematology & Stem Cell Transplant, King Faisal Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, SA and colleagues conducted a literature review2 from the PubMed and Cochrane databases, using the search terms, ‘post-transplant cyclophosphamide’ and ‘matched donors’. The team selected English language and peer-reviewed journals.
The team reviewed a number of studies of intensive pre-transplant conditioning.
Study |
N |
Conditioning |
Donor type |
Graft |
aGvHD |
cGvHD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Luznik et al3 |
117 |
BU/CY |
MRD MUD |
BM |
II: 43% III: 10% |
- |
Carnevale-Schianca et al4 |
35 |
Intensive |
MRD: 10 MUD: 25 |
PB |
II: 12% |
Two year: 7% |
Greco et al5 |
28 |
Diverse |
MRD: 15 MUD: 13 |
PB |
II: 23% III: 4% |
One year: 13% |
Mielcarek et al6 |
43 |
BU/FLU |
MRD: 12 MUD: 31 |
PB |
II: 77% |
One year: 16% |
Acute leukemia working party EBMT7 |
423 |
Myeloablative/RIC |
MRD: 241 MUD: 182 |
BM: 108 PB: 315 |
No significant difference |
- |
Table 1: Comparison of studies using PTCy after intensive conditioning
Study |
N |
Conditioning |
Donor type |
Graft |
aGvHD |
cGvHD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
92 |
RIC |
MRD MUD |
PB |
|
|
|
Solomon et al8 |
26 |
RIC: BU/FLU/CY |
MRD: 17 MUD: 9 |
PB |
II—IV: 46% III—IV: 15% |
|
Alousi et al9 |
49 |
BU/CY |
MRD: 15 MUD: 34 |
PB: 11 BM: 38 |
II: 26 III: 11 |
N = 9 |
Moiseev et al10 |
86 |
RIC: 76% MAC: 24% |
MUD |
PB |
II—IV: 19% III—IV: 4% |
16% |
Ruggari et al11 |
423 |
RIC: 42% MAC: 54% |
MRD: 241 MUD: 182 |
PB: 271 BM: 108 |
II—IV: 27.9% |
One year: 33% |
Table 2: Comparison of studies using PTCy after RIC
The analysed literature suggests that PTCy reduces the incidence of both aGvHD, cGvHD, and GRFS compared with standard GvHD prophylaxis, without significantly increasing the risk of relapse. Adding calcineurin inhibitors may further reduce GvHD incidences after blood cell grafts.
The team elaborated on the limitations of their review; detailing how there are very few studies with high quality data, with most studies being uncontrolled, having few patients that have a variety of disease diagnoses and states. Often, the studies use differing donor types, graft types and conditioning regimens, and combine the use of cyclophosphamide with other immunosuppressant drugs. This makes it difficult to define the contribution of each drug to the observed outcomes.
Understanding with certainty whether PTCy is actually effective in the prevention or reduction of cGvHD or aGvHD, would require testing the hypothesis in randomized, double-blind clinical studies with large numbers of patients.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox