All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The GvHD Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Medac and supported through grants from Sanofi and Therakos. The funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) for allogeneic stem cell transplantation is known to induce graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and thereby increase non-relapse mortality (NRM). Immunosuppressive therapies to reduce the risk of GvHD may often come at the price of higher relapse rates. Therefore, new strategies to reduce GvHD while maintaining low relapse rates are needed.
On Tuesday 26 March 2019, Oral Session 03 (OS03) took place at the 45th Annual Meeting of the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), Frankfurt, DE. During that session, Abstract OS03-2 was presented by Maria Queralt Salas from Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Hans Messner Allogeneic BMT Program, Toronto, Canada.
The primary objective of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of reducing the intensity conditioning regimen (RIC) combined with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), as well as post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Age (years) |
|
Median age range |
56 (19-73) |
|
|
Disease risk index |
N (%) |
Low |
6 (6) |
Intermediate |
81 (78) |
High |
16 (15) |
Very high |
0 |
Not available |
1 (1) |
|
|
Cytogenetic at diagnosis |
|
Low risk |
6 (6) |
Intermediate risk |
70 (67) |
Poor risk |
27 (26) |
Not available |
1 (1) |
|
|
Stage at transplant |
|
Complete remission 1 |
86 (83) |
Complete remission 2-3 |
15 (14) |
Residual disease |
3 (3) |
HCT-CI ≥ 4 |
13 (13) |
Karnovsky Performance index (KPS) ≤ 80 % |
18 (17) |
|
|
Donor type |
|
10/10 MRD |
22 (21) |
10/10 MUD |
38 (37) |
9/10 MMUD |
15 (14) |
Haploidentical donors |
29 (28) |
Table 1: Summary of patients and methods
The study identified that the main causes of death were:
The key findings can be found summarized in Table 2 and Table 3.
|
N (%) |
Engraftment information (days) |
|
Median time neutrophil engraftment |
16 (10-43) |
Median time platelet engraftment |
19 (7-217) |
|
|
Infectious complications |
|
CMV reactivation / CMV disease |
61 (56) / 6 (6) |
EBV reactivation |
64 (61) |
Presumed / Proven -PTLD |
3 (3) / 7 (7) |
BK Cystitis |
7 (7) |
Other viral infection |
34 (33) |
Fungal infection – Presumed / Proved |
7 (7) / 0 |
|
|
Cumulative incidence of GvHD |
|
Grade II-IV Acute (day +100) |
16.1 (0-32.9) |
Grade III-IV Acute (day +100) |
1.9 (0-10) |
Chronic (moderate/severe) 1 year |
8 (0-16.7) |
|
|
Relapse |
27 (26) |
Death |
41 (29) |
Causes of death |
|
Infection |
14 (13) |
GvHD |
0 |
Relapse |
19 (18) |
Multi-organ failure |
2 (2) |
Graft failure |
3 (3) |
Bleeding |
2 (2) |
Deconditioned (positive) |
1 (1) |
Table 2: Key findings
|
OS |
RFS |
Univariate analysis |
P value |
P value |
Disease risk index |
0.102 |
0.196 |
Cytogenetic at diagnosis |
0.886 |
0.823 |
Not in complete remission |
0.0001 |
0.002 |
KPS ≤ 80% |
0.004 |
0.014 |
HCT-CI ≥4 |
0.657 |
0.670 |
Donor type |
0.476 |
0.262 |
Chimerism ≥95% at day 60+ |
0.072 |
0.004 |
Table 3: Univariate analysis *RFS (Relapse-free survival)
Dr. Queralt Salas concluded that the combination therapy, RIC with ATG and PTCy provided a very low rate of both aGvHD and cGvHD, as well as an adequate relapse rate. The univariant analysis identified that OS and RFS were not significantly affected by donor type or cytogenetic risk type. However, KPS <80% and not achieving CR before the transplant was associated with a significantly lower OS and RFS. Dr. Queralt Salas ended the session by emphasizing that this protocol gives enough graft-versus-leukemia effect in those patients who have high-risk leukemia, however, patients with active disease at the time of transplant may not benefit from this protocol.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox