All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional.

The GvHD Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your GvHD Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The GvHD Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the GvHD Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The GvHD Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2019-06-13T14:04:57.000Z

ASCO 2019 | Results of a phase II study: Post-transplant cyclophosphamide in matched and haploidentical transplant recipients receiving myeloablative timed sequential busulfan conditioning regimen

Jun 13, 2019
Share:

Bookmark this article

On Saturday, June 1 2019, during the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting in Chicago, US, Uday R. Popat, from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, discussed the results of a prospective phase II study (NCT02861417), evaluating post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) in matched and haploidentical transplant recipients receiving a myeloablative fractionated busulfan conditioning regimen.1

There is an unmet need for a myeloablative conditioning regimen that reduced relapse rates without increasing Graft-versus-Host Disease (GvHD) related non-relapse mortality. Dr. Popat discussed how timed sequential busulfan (TSB) with fludarabine (Flu) is a promising myeloablative regimen for patients undergoing matched sibling (MSD) or unrelated (MUD) donor transplantation (HCT) with low non-relapse mortality (NRM), which has until now not been tested in haploidentical (haplo) donor transplantation.

Patient characteristics

 

N = 55

Percentage %

Diagnosis

AML/MDS

30

55

CML/MPD

9

16

Lymphoma

5

9

Myeloma

5

9

ALL

6

11

Age, median (range)

47

15-65

Comorbidity score > 2

22

40

Disease Risk Index

High

18

32

Intermediate

32

58

Low

5

9

Donor

Matched Related

11

20

Haploidentical related

26

47

Matched Unrelated

18

33

Cell source

 

 

Peripheral blood

26

31

Bone Marrow

29

35

 Methods

  • Patients received fixed doses of Busulfan (BU) 80mg/m2 either on day -13 and -12 (n=45) or on -20 and -13 (n=10).
  • Then, on day -6 to -2 Flu 40mg/m2 plus Bu were administered daily with Bu dosed to achieve target area under the curve (AUC) of 20,000 µmol/min
  • Thiotepa 5mg/kg was given on day -7 to recipients of haplo donors
  • GvHD prophylaxis:
    • PT-Cy 50mg/kg on day 3 and 4
    • Tacrolimus +/- mycophenolate mofetil starting day 5

Results (median follow up of 17 months):

 

Results (N = 55)

95% CI

OS, 1 yr. in all patients

71 %

(60-84%)

OS, 1 yr. after MSD HCT (n =11)

91 %

(75-100 %)

OS, 1 yr. after MUD HCT  (n =18)

72 %

(54-96 %)

OS, 1 yr. after haplo HCT  (n =26)

62 %

(45-83%)

PFS, 1 yr.

63 %

(51-77 %)

Relapse, 1 yr.

17 %

(7-27%)

NRM, 1 year

20 %

(9-31 %)

Acute GVHD II-IV

38 %

(25-51 %)

Acute GVHD III-IV

9 %

(1-17 %)

Chronic GVHD, 1 yr.

10 %

(2-18 %)

Extensive Chronic GVHD

8 %

(0-15 %)

Graft failure

0 %

0 %

Engraftments and Chimerism 

  • There was no graft failure
  • Neutrophils: 17 (13-39) days
  • Platelets: 25 (11-167)

Grade 3-5 Toxicity

 

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Total (%)

Neutropenic Fever

32

0

0

32 (58)

Infections

12

1

5

18 (33)

Mucositis

13

1

0

14 (25)

Bilirubin

6

1

0

7 (13)

Pneumonia

4

2

0

6 (11)

Pulmonary

1

3

1

5 (9)

VOD

3

0

1

4 (7)

Hemorrhagic Cystitis

4

0

0

4 (7)

 *Only ≥ 2 total events per system were considered in the study

Conclusions: 

Dr. Popat concluded that myeloablative fractioned busulfan conditioning combined with PT-Cy GvHD prophylaxis seems to reduce both, the incidence of severe acute and chronic GvHD and relapse rate in the haplo HCT setting and needs to be studied further.

  1. Popat. UR. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide in matched and haploidentical transplant recipients receiving myeloablative timed sequential busulfan conditioning regimen: Results of a phase II study.  2019 American Society of Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, Chicago, US.

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to GvHD delivered to your inbox